Unlocked CDMA phones??
gsm being a simpler technology they those issues are not as bad so you will see unlocked gsm phones.
stevelvl said:
gsm being a simpler technology they those issues are not as bad so you will see unlocked gsm phones.
I guess that means the older Analog and Digital (1G, 2G) phones use advanced technology because they have an ESN? π
there is no such thing as 1g because 1 g was analog. 2g was digital 3g is when they added internet to the phone that used a packeted data delivery system. but i doubt you know what a packeted delivery system is any ways. π€
and for analog there was unlocked phones avalible back when they used to widely use analog. as for 2g phones yes 2g cdma is a more advnced system then gsm. because it is sentually the same as 3g just with out the packeted internet protocall.
CDMA is not more advanced than GSM... They are two technologies of the same timeline... Simply because CDMA has influenced certain aspects of 3G techs (not all) does not make it "more advanced"... I would accept that CDMA has a better concept... But to say it's "more advanced" because it influenced a couple 3G techs is just simple-minded.
It's like saying Unix 1.0 is more advanced than Linux 9.2 because Linux is based on the Unix coding...
stevelvl said:
actually if you knew any thing about the industry there is no such thing as a digital 1g phone.
there is no such thing as 1g because 1 g was analog. 2g was digital 3g is when they added internet to the phone that used a packeted data delivery system. but i doubt you know what a packeted delivery system is any ways. π€
and for analog there was unlocked phones avalible back when they used to widely use analog. as for 2g phones yes 2g cdma is a more advnced system then gsm. because it is sentually the same as 3g just with out the packeted internet protocall.
stevelvl said:...
ok fine if you want to play sematics then no cdma is not more advanced. would you perfe
(continues)
speck said:
*clears throat*
CDMA is not more advanced than GSM... They are two technologies of the same timeline... Simply because CDMA has influenced certain aspects of 3G techs (not all) does not make it "more advanced"... I would accept that CDMA has a better concept... But to say it's "more advanced" because it influenced a couple 3G techs is just simple-minded.
It's like saying Unix 1.0 is more advanced than Linux 9.2 because Linux is based on the Unix coding...
ok fine if you want to play sematics then no cdma is not more advanced. would you perfet to word sensitive? my point i was trying to convay is that cdma is more sisative to actuall settings with in the device. just ask any one who has t...
(continues)
stevelvl said:
actually if you knew any thing about the industry there is no such thing as a digital 1g phone.
there is no such thing as 1g because 1 g was analog. 2g was digital 3g is when they added internet to the phone that used a packeted data delivery system. but i doubt you know what a packeted delivery system is any ways. π€
.... That would be why I said both Analog and Digital. Check it out: (You'll notice both 2 references in those brackets.)
...Tebor0 said:
I guess that means the older Analog and Digital (1G,
(continues)