Who bought who???
I've heard Sprint bought Nextel and Nextel bought Sprint, which is it? Hard to tell with the looks of the new brochures and the website looks like a variation mostly of Nextel's.
...
WRONG!
it was a stock and cash deal. 1.26 per in stock and .84 per share in cash. (if you are a netel shareholder you would get that)
it was a stock and cash deal. 1.26 per in stock and .84 per share in cash. (if you are a netel shareholder you would get that)
...
sprint bought out nextel, but in reality its a merger of equals.
it was a stock and cash deal. 1.26 per in stock and .84 per share in cash. (if you are a netel shareholder you would get that)
it will be a 51 to 49 percent ownership in favor of sprint, but they need to have that ownership becuase they want to do a proper tax free spin off of local. in order to do that successfuly, they need to have control of the company.
it is a merger of equals as i mentioned before.
it was a stock and cash deal. 1.26 per in stock and .84 per share in cash. (if you are a netel shareholder you would get that)
it will be a 51 to 49 percent ownership in favor of sprint, but they need to have that ownership becuase they want to do a proper tax free spin off of local. in order to do that successfuly, they need to have control of the company.
it is a merger of equals as i mentioned before.
...
nextel18 said:
sprint bought out nextel, but in reality its a merger of equals.
it was a stock and cash deal. 1.26 per in stock and .84 per share in cash. (if you are a netel shareholder you would get that)
it will be a 51 to 49 percent ownership in favor of sprint, but they need to have that ownership becuase they want to do a proper tax free spin off of local. in order to do that successfuly, they need to have control of the company.
it is a merger of equals as i mentioned before.
I stand corrected, it was a stock AND cash deal. Nextel18 finally got one, except for the fact that he cant spell NeXtel. I don't rightly understand how it can be considered a merger of equals, though.
...
get one right? i always get things right. sorry. 🙂
now your making fun of me becuase i forgot to place an X? lol how pathetic.
the first sentence i spelled it right lol... anywya.
why dont you understand its a merger of equals?
1. they have the same market cap.
2. they are using 6 and 6 top execs to be on the new company's board from both companies.
thus; its a merger of equals.
as mentioned before on paper it isnt becuase of what i explained earlier with the spinco.
now your making fun of me becuase i forgot to place an X? lol how pathetic.
the first sentence i spelled it right lol... anywya.
why dont you understand its a merger of equals?
1. they have the same market cap.
2. they are using 6 and 6 top execs to be on the new company's board from both companies.
thus; its a merger of equals.
as mentioned before on paper it isnt becuase of what i explained earlier with the spinco.
...
no.. it was a merger of equals.
1. same market cap
2. 6 execs from each company will be in the new company.
thus; merger of equals.
on paper its not becuase of the proper tax free spin off of local.
1. same market cap
2. 6 execs from each company will be in the new company.
thus; merger of equals.
on paper its not becuase of the proper tax free spin off of local.
...
Dude, get fo real..........nextel sucked until now......i dont care how many execs they brought or what. Only thing they had going was NASCAR and a stupid redneck trademark walkie talkie.
...
nah nextel never "sucked"
they are leading in basically every category but total subscribers and quarter sub growth.
they are leading in basically every category but total subscribers and quarter sub growth.
...
Or...who bought whom...for those of us speaking the english language...ha, just ragging you, little D. 😛
...
