Which is better?
though i am certainly not an expert...i prefer nokia to most any other brand due to dependability. Thats just my opinion though. I am sure the Razr has some great features and it looks killer 🙂 good luck!
...
I would take the Razr, without a doubt. Reason being is the Samsung is digital only and it only takes two 12-second video clips, which come out terribly. The Nokia is just a mistake, the screen is terrible, the picture quality is repulsive, the speakerphone shouldn't even be discussed. The only thing that the Nokia 6255i has on the Razr is the MMC reader, which is pretty nice.
...
I bagged the RAZR! Really bad echo when talking, buzzing sound coming from the earpiece and a loose keypad. The RAZR might be razor thin, but it sure has a wide @$$. I am now using the Samsung and its a really good phone.
...
setlikeamf said:
I bagged the RAZR! Really bad echo when talking, buzzing sound coming from the earpiece and a loose keypad. The RAZR might be razor thin, but it sure has a wide @$$. I am now using the Samsung and its a really good phone.
I didn't like it either. TOO thin. Hard to hang onto. No buzzing problem on mine but there have been 2 or 3 reports of that in the user reviews.
Hey Set, does your screen name mean what I think it means? LOL.
...
Depends on what you value. Moto's phone OS sucks pondscum. The RAZR looks a lot cooler though.
...
Razr. Both are slim on included accessories, but the Moto will give you better reception. The 6255 took forever to get through testing...
...
Well I have carried both, The Razrs reception on the outskirts of the local coverage area Suck. The Nokia has much better reception quality. I currently carry the razr simply b/c it has more features I use including how thin it is. So in the reception contest the nokia wins!!
...
