"FCC mandated" phone upgrade to GPS-capable phone
Quick version of the story:
- Many USCC customers got a letter last week saying that they are "required to upgrade" their phones to GPS-capable phones, or you will "be charged a substantial monthly fee".
- They said the reason for this is because of a few FCC requirement.
- I talked to someone at the FCC today, and they said that there is no requirement for people to upgrade their phones, only for the network to support the GPS features.
- USCC said that special pricing was available for this upgrade, but the prices are the same as you would always be able to get by signing a two-year contract.
I r...
(continues)
And, since you've been a loyal USCC customer for so many years I would assume that that is because you like their service.
Accept one of the low-cost GPS/CDMA capable handsets and smile. You'll have what you've had for ten years. Good service.
The phone I am being asked (strongly) to upgrade is already a CDMA phone, it just doesn't have GPS.
My wife and I have been USCC customers for almost 10 years. We currently have 4 phone lines, and pay them over $100 a month. The phone in question (only 1 of the 4) has been out of its contract for almost 2 years.
For the most part USCC has been good to us. But, they have done a few things recently to make me not trust them. (changing the price of my Night and Weekend Minutes on me, etc)
Remember, what I am saying FCC is coming straight from the FCC, not from me. The following is a quote directly from the FCC:
...the (FCC) rules address "NEW handsets activated" and "NEW digital handsets activated" [uppercase emphasis added]. We find nothing in the rules requiring a subscriber to change equipment, and there’s certainly n...
(continues)
What's funny is that there was a deadline for the carriers to implement this, but no deadline for municipalities to install it into their 911 centers.
"you must replace all of your non-compliant phones with new phones with GPS technology or risk being charged a substantial monthly non-compliance fee."
I called the 1-800 number in the letter and I asked for more information on this. They said that I "will" start getting charged a fee on 4/29/06, they just don't yet know how large it will be.
Though I don't see how any "future business ventures" as you put it, would impact gps/e911... I can see an impact on CDMA/TDMA/GSM etc... but they are already CDMA. (and there is such a thing as a CDMA phone without GPS, I have it and it is what started this whole mess)
I guess we will just wait and see, since you obviously aren't giving any more information.
(continues)
1). Make sure the phone is actually for USCC. WE CANNOT ACTIVATE OTHER CARRIERS EQUIPMENT EVEN IF ITS THE SAME EXACT BRAND OF PHONE.
2). If you buy from ebay be cautious. There are many great deals out there but before you buy get the serial number (esn number) and call CS 888-944-9400 to verify that esn is clear to activate with us. (not stolen, lost etc.)
Just trying to help ya out. Also realize that when you do upgrade to a newer phone your reception, sound quality, etc. should all improve greatly.
Thanks for the help and advice. I apreciate you taking the time to write, and to look into this.
I do understand that I went from 3000 to Unlimited N&W minutes, but my issue is that 3000 wwas more than enough for me, and it now costs me $5 more. If I get rid of N&W minutes I would run out of anytime minutes very quickly. When I signed a contract I assumed (incorrectly) that the 3000 N&W for $5 was part of that contract, and was frustrated to be told that I essentially had to pay more.
Thanks again for the advise. At least for now I am going to ride this out a little more, and see where things go.
Back on March first you said that something major was going to happen at "the end of may or early part of june". We are there, and I haven't heard of anything. Or is this the "Project Heartland" that has been asked about? Any more info?
The requirement by the FCC to mandate GPS capable phones.. it is uner the PDF file 20.18 911 on page 2 section G
Again, a quote from the FCC:
The FCC, in permissive language, has said wireless carriers "MAY [upper case emphasis added] phase in deployment of Phase II enhanced 911 service"
They also said:
...there’s certainly no FCC requirement that a subscriber be "charged a substantial monthly non-compliance fee".
(v) By December 31, 2005, achieve 95 percent penetration of
location-capable handsets among its subscribers.
Therefore, USCC needed to have 95% of its handsets to get e911 compatible as of the end of last year, and they got in trouble with the FCC for not reaching it. So they had to send out a bunch of letters to people to get them to upgrade
yes, you can stay on your old plan
yes, it sucks you need to give up your Moto V120 or NOkia 5165 or whatever, but generally people are happier with the new phones
yes, it sucks that you may get fined, but the FCC is the one who is requiring it, and they are the ones who will fine USCC for noncompliance, and ...
(continues)
If, in fact USCC is being charged a fee for not reaching this goal, I still am not sure it is legal of them to pass that along to the customers.
The reasons you mentioned why it isn't a big deal to upgrade, I agree with. Every one of them. But, the one thing you missed was the fact that to do this you need to sign a new contract.
I am at a point right now where I will not sign myself into 2 more years, and that is nothing against USCC.... they have been good to me. But, I have about 6-8 reasons why I don't want to sign a contract right now, and many of them are because of features/coverage/pl...
(continues)
March 3, 2006
Recently there was an overwhelming response to the E911 initiative and we received some negative feedback from our customers about the "substantial monthly non-compliance fee" as well as the requirement for a contract renewal when upgrading their handset to get the offer. In order to provide the best customer satisfaction, it was decided that further customer communications related to this campaign will be indefinitely postponed. Going forward, customers already targeted in this initiative will not be required to renew their contract when taking advantage of this offer.
Facts about the "substantial monthly non-compliance fee":
The possibility of a future non-compliance fee is not being dir...
(continues)
(And by the way, I am not intending this to be an "anti-USCC" post, I am simply stating the facts.)
-US Cellular (as other posts have talked about) is no longer requiring a 2 year contract in order to upgrade to GPS phones.
-They are also saying that there will no longer be charging a "substantial monthy fee" if you don't upgrade you...
(continues)
5. Then why did I get this letter? To try to trick and scare you into a new phone and 2 year contract.
so that if you called 911 for help that you could hopefully be found.Why would you want to keep the old piece of junk phone you had anyway ?If you came in on your own to get a phone it would have cost big time be thankful you can get it for a penny also that old batt wont last forever and batt. sell for around $50.00.also at our store all you had to say was " I dont want to sign a contract " and we would have OK. end of it !!!
I got another letter in the mail from USCC about the E911 issue. I had previously learned on this forum that USCC was no longer requiring a contract and that there would be no fee if you didn't upgrade... but they actually owned up to their mistake and sent out a letter saying exactly that to everyone.
Good job USCC. I am still not a 100% satisfied customer, but this helped quite a bit.