Verizon Regains Lead In Wireless Subscribers; Sprint Gets Some Good News
Market research firm IDC says there were 236 million U.S. wireless subscribers at the end of 2006 and their data revenue totaled $4.8 billion in the fourth quarter.
By W. David Gardner
InformationWeek
April 4, 2007 11:19 AM
Battered by a run of bad news in recent months, Sprint Nextel received some welcome news Wednesday when research firm IDC reported that its customers spend more on wireless data than the customers of other wireless carriers.
IDC also said Verizon Wireless had moved past AT&T's Cingular Wireless in an important subscriber category. "Verizon became the new market leader in terms of total direct retail subscribers/customers, with a...
(continues)
jackieramossteel said:
IDC also said Verizon Wireless had moved past AT&T's Cingular Wireless in an important subscriber category. "Verizon became the new market leader in terms of total direct retail subscribers/customers, with a total of 56.8 million, against 56.3 million for Cingular," said IDC's Julien Blin in a statement.
500,000 lead?
ibanezex718 said:
the only reason sprint's ahead in data is because they keep losing all their voice customers because they always get dropped calls!!
Weird, I've had Sprint for years and never get dropped calls. Stop believing all the hype.
PhoneMan3 said:
Also, Sprint has the cheapest data plan with their Vision pack @ $15 while Verizon's data package requires you to get little minutes for $79.99 or get a lot of minutes for over $100. If they were to get a cheaper internet plan, those sales would go up trmendously
Verizon doesn't care and charges whatever they want. Business and consumers are so brain washed by the "its the network" crap that they blindly pay whatever and put up with all their bull limitations without question. Sprint's network is just as good and their prices are fully reasonable.
I have a Sanyo 200, rated best entry level phone for Sprint in 2005 by CR(Consumer Reports). It consistently gets better reception than my wife's 8200, side-by-side.
I drop calls with Sprint. It's not hype.
the ONLY reason I may stay with them is the plan I have. Voice network, IMAO, sucks.
ajstrong said:
their voice network where I've been (WA, OK, IL, MN, MT, and all driving points in between) is sub-par.
I have a Sanyo 200, rated best entry level phone for Sprint in 2005 by CR(Consumer Reports). It consistently gets better reception than my wife's 8200, side-by-side.
I drop calls with Sprint. It's not hype.
the ONLY reason I may stay with them is the plan I have. Voice network, IMAO, sucks.
If I were to go by personal experience, which you have, to determine service, I would have voted the otherway at least in IL and MN. I haven't been to WA or MT so I have no clue. OK, I'd buy tha Sprint was better. Verizon still doesn't to wide of a build out in OK and Sprint does, so fai...
(continues)
jackieramossteel said:
Sprint Nextel received some welcome news Wednesday when research firm IDC reported that its customers spend more on wireless data than the customers of other wireless carriers.
probably has something to do with not letting ppl bluetooth ringtones and songs to each other. i always knew there was a reason, like i tell me customers when they ask why sprint doesnt let you do that, "sprint doesnt like it when you buy one ringtone and give it to 20 friends, they tend not to want to lose money that way.