Voayger vs Iphone
The both have their pros and cons. And how can you argue that the voygager doesnt have true HTML? Have you seen the screen shoots of various webpages? Cuz I have, and they look pretty good.
Voyager has: 3G internet, expandable memory, removable battery, built in GPS capabilities, 2 keyboards (touchscreen and real qwerty), it has 2 great screens, stereo speakers, MMS messaging (no go on the iphone), and a lower price point. And you can insure the damn thing--cant do that with att.
The iphone is a cool phone, but there is room for improvement. And I think the voyager is overall better solution for a lot of people.
The iphone will still win on the software side of things. that UI is pretty slick.
GIN applications, VCAST video and TV capable makes it easy to download videos on the go. No preloaded Youtube videos when you can just go on vcast and get em.
You can't compare a Rolls Royce to a BMW either....and the Voyager is a Rolls.... 😈
Besides...using your logic, you could say that the iPhone is a knock off of the LG KE850. So really, the Voyager is just a knock off of one of LG's own products. Idiot.
Truth-Seeker said:
I agree the voyager is a cheap knock of the iphone. It does not have true html browsing. for a mp3 player ? how can a phone compete with a IPod. the touch screen on the Iphone is not as bad as people hyped up to be. Can anyone list some pro's and cons of each ?
First off, contrary to what you say, the Voyager does have true HTML browsing.
Secondly, while I like the iPhone, it is not without some major weaknesses. Mainly:
- no 3G... rather, its got slow-ass EDGE 😢
- no MMS. WTF? What year is this?
- no voice-calling. Huh?
- extremely limited bluetooth, last I checked. And ATT folks like to complain about how VZW cripples its bluetooth? Whoa.
- no GPS
- many ppl complain...
(continues)