Open Access clarification
(continues)
my bad dude!
i suck at forums... âšī¸
Phantom1359 said:
Well just remember...it was stated that "Open Access" won't be launched until late 2008. The first step is already being made ((happy valentines day to you from Red lol))...so things can change. Not all services may work on the phone...BUT!...ya never know what can happen down the line. I just wonder how many people have realized that if you're the first with the phone to be tested...wave bye bye for 3 weeks(about). Now what remains to be seen is...lets say someone sends an Ocean to be tested...does every person after have to send theirs, or will it go up on the list for "auto approval". Time will tell, but it's a step forward!
I would not doubt Commie Verizon would want you to send AL...
(continues)
Does open access really scare you that much? Does the knowledge that CDMA is better than your pathetic GSM really make you want to cry that much?
Give up my phone to the Czar. IF they approve it, they will allow one to use to use it.
You are right when GSM phones can be used on VErizon's network, ONLY then will you have open access worth a crap. UNtil then its like their giantic network,
If you ar here you can get thses sevices but not these, If you are there you can make a call but cannot use the Internet,,,,on and on and on,,,,IN Network or OUT Netowork....
With GSM the national digital signal allows ALL features all the time. If you get bars you have all of it.
Open access my assis...
Also, even with an unlocked GSM handset, some data features of TMO or AT&T may or may not work without tweaking, if at all.
Astronaut HS 88 said:
GSM will not EVER work on the CDMA network. LTE is NOT GSM, so your GSM handset will not work on LTE.
Also, even with an unlocked GSM handset, some data features of TMO or AT&T may or may not work without tweaking, if at all.
This article seems to prove that wrong. The best thing that could happen for Verizon is to be able to use GSM phones,,,but that won't happen,,,
Verizon dumps CDMA for GSM-based LTE in 4G networks
LTE is a progression of GSM's UMTS platform, making it an ironic choice for CDMA stalwart Verizon and a huge blow for the CDMA Development Group's competing UMB standard.
Astronaut HS 88 said:
GSM will not EVER work on the CDMA network. LTE is NOT GSM, so your GSM handset will not work on LTE.
LTE is a progression of GSM's UMTS platform, making it an ironic choice for CDMA stalwart Verizon and a huge blow for the CDMA Development Group's competing UMB standard.
Do you hear me now?
?
AvgJoe said:
LTE is a progression of GSM's UMTS platform, making it an ironic choice for CDMA stalwart Verizon and a huge blow for the CDMA Development Group's competing UMB standard.
Do you hear me now?
?
Actually, what's ironic is that you'd say that, considering that "GSM's UMTS platform" is actually largely based on CDMA technology... or did you not know UMTS by its other name, WCDMA? GSM already LOST the tech war long ago. đ¤Ŗ
Oh, and LTE isn't GSM, though you can quote all the confused tech reporters you'd like... facts are facts, and fact is, GSM is TDMA-based, aka dark ages tech. LTE is OFDM-based, i.e. not the same thing at all. Duhhhhhhhhhhhh. đ
Looks like I lowered your b...
(continues)
SystemShock said:...AvgJoe said:
LTE is a progression of GSM's UMTS platform, making it an ironic choice for CDMA stalwart Verizon and a huge blow for the CDMA Development Group's competing UMB standard.
Do you hear me now?
?
Actually, what's ironic is that you'd say that, considering that "GSM's UMTS platform" is actually largely based on CDMA technology... or did you not know UMTS by its other name, WCDMA? GSM already LOST the tech war long ago. đ¤Ŗ
Oh, and LTE isn't
GSM, though you can quote all the confused tech reporters you'd like... facts are facts, and fact is, GSM is TDMA-based, aka dark ages tech. LTE is OFDM-based, i.e. not the same thing at all. Duhhhhhhhhh
(continues)
Actually, what's ironic is that you'd say that, considering that "GSM's UMTS platform" is actually largely based on CDMA technology... or did you not know UMTS by its other name, WCDMA? GSM already LOST the tech war long ago.
I would not call open access BT, GPS and the use ANY GSM phone losing the "tech war"
I would call that LEADING the tech war....
wombough said:
AVG Joe does not know that the GSM carriers 3g is not based off GSM. He stoped responing to another thread when I pointed this out. But he still doesn't get it!
Well, yes Wom, but keep in mind that he can't help it, on account of being highly stupid. đŗ
It's okay, I'm sure he gets a swell short bus to ride around in, and his walking helmet probably has pretty star decals on it.
In fact, this would be a pic of AJ. He's a cute lil' devil:
http://www.breakitdownblog.com/wp-content/uploads/20 ... »
Yeah, it sure is funny that GSM had to run crying to CDMA to get a decent air interface for their 3G. But that's what happens when you rely on stone-age tech.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go light a fire by rubbing two GSM handsets together...
SystemShock said:
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go light a fire by rubbing two GSM handsets together...
OK I know you are living in the past on past glory ..but here's a tip. Use a match or lighter.
"easing off the BT crippling" Either you can use all the BT features or you can't. Easing off? What's that? Almost pregnant?
Yeah and GPS ..So far what I have read bout Verizon's "open source" is not impressive...."Send your new phone to Verizon AFTER you buy it to see if it will work? WTF? That's open source? Can't wait to see what their version of open source GPS will be. Point your phone at the sun?
AvgJoe said:SystemShock said:
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go light a fire by rubbing two GSM handsets together...
OK I know you are living in the past on past glory ..but here's a tip. Use a match or lighter.
Wow... you're getting pretty high tech there for a GSM user. Didn't you guys just discover the wheel and fire last week? đ
"easing off the BT crippling" Either you can use all the BT features or you can't. Easing off? What's that? Almost pregnant?
Don't know what to tell ya, Joey... I transfer pics just fine to my laptop from my allegedly 'crippled' VZW phone. Maybe if you weren't obsessed with 'VZW 2005', you'd be u...
(continues)
As long as Verizon has Kool-Aid drinkers they will charge for GPS and you will have to use Cell towers rather then satellites. You will HAVE to be IN Network to use GPS. What good is GPS if you cannot use it ANYWHERE? And WHY PAY FOR THAT?
Far as GPS goes, I'll see what the open network brings. The funny thing? It hasn't even STARTED yet and you're already crying about it. đŗ
Man, what did VZW do to you... run over your dog and steal your prom date?
Who hurt you, Joe... *whispers*.... who hurt you? đ¤Ŗ
I mean, ATT totally sucks in my neck of the woods, but you don't see me running crying, screaming and wetting my pants to the ATT forum, demanding ...
(continues)
wombough said:
you know most complain becuase they know how good something is and if they convince themself its bad then they can live with their choice! đ
Yeah, I guess it is kinda like buyer's remorse for him... he spent too much money on his high-end Nokias, and all just to get crap signal on ATT. He dropped one too many calls, and... boing! Went totally berserk. đ˛
Now he haunts the VZW forums, sucking the intelligence of the living.... đ
I paid for the phone I wanted. I don't live from upgrade to upgrade like you guys .....marking my calender to the day when I can get Free phone or $50 off a crippled phone with the same old GUI.
Yeah Im mad as hell đ¤Ŗ
đ¤Ŗ đ¤Ŗ
AvgJoe said:
Yeah Im mad as hell đ¤Ŗ :
Of course you are. Nothing else would explain your sad, little boy, trolling behavior. đ˛
Verizon does not suck in my neck of the woods. They just don't have the phone features I actually use. Their GPS is tower based (and costs more to use it) I guess its not even considered data, You cannot buy a phone with native GUI, They claim to have the fastest data. They better have becasue you need it for everything.They are learning though and slowly adapting to the way of the GSM Carriers. Even getting their phones.
I can remove the SIM card and still use all the featur...
(continues)
wombough said:
GSM Carriers are learning to that GSM has gone as far as it can go and will go bye bye once WCDMA is deployed network wide. They will switch voice over to it too and GSM will be just history!
And good riddance to it too... the hard-handoffs, the slow data, the intolerance of weaker signals, the dropped calls... I think I saw some caveman drawings the other day... in them were the schematics to a GSM handset. đ
wombough said:
GSM Carriers are learning to that GSM has gone as far as it can go and will go bye bye once WCDMA is deployed network wide. They will switch voice over to it too and GSM will be just history!
And? If that were to happen ATT will Still get better open source phones because Verizon cannot keep their hands out of their customer's pockets.
IF GSM Carriers switch to WCDMA for voice world wide Veriaon will be in deep trouble. They hang their hat on their supposed better network. IF the networks are equal why go with Verizon?
Check out churn rates, JD Power, Consumer Reports, 3G coverage, whatever... ATT is still behind the times. Nothin' new there, though. And kind of crappy customer service to boot.
But look on the bright side... ATT is so awesome, they're getting a lot of PREPAID folks to sign up! Good to know that you're part of that discerning audience of ppl who couldn't pass a credit check! đ
SystemShock said:
Gosh, it's not a 'supposedly' better network, Joey... its just a better network.
Check out churn rates, JD Power, Consumer Reports, 3G coverage, whatever... ATT is still behind the times. Nothin' new there, though. And kind of crappy customer service to boot.
But look on the bright side... ATT is so awesome, they're getting a lot of PREPAID folks to sign up! Good to know that you're part of that discerning audience of ppl who couldn't pass a credit check! đ
You're reaching now, I could care less about ATT's business results or their JD Power ratings. I ONLY care about what they do for ME.
AM I satisfied? Yes. Do I care about pre paid ? NO. Im not even on contract. No ince...
(continues)
AvgJoe said:
I could care less about ATT's business results or their JD Power ratings. I ONLY care about what they do for ME.
AM I satisfied? Yes.
Of course. Like you said, you don't care about signal. Durhhhhhh... đ
SystemShock said:AvgJoe said:
I could care less about ATT's business results or their JD Power ratings. I ONLY care about what they do for ME.
AM I satisfied? Yes.
Of course. Like you said, you don't care about signal. Durhhhhhh... đ
I said I would rather live with ATT's worse signal then Verizon's best phone. A few dropped calls are a small price to pay for the freedom and flexibility of GSM networks, VEry small price.
wombough said:
man I am missing sooooo much flexibility. What am I thinking for choosing CDMA. Along with 150 million other people. We all must be so stupid.
Yeah, and we miss the thrill of ATT's dropped calls and crappy CS. Will my call go through, or not? And will the ATT CSR on the phone be helpful, or surly?
Ooooh.... SO exciting!!! đ
No wonder CDMA is more popular in the US than GSM.
But what else can I expect from a guy who says signal doesn't matter, and thinks LTE is GSM? đ¤Ŗ
"Durhhhhhhhhhh, OFDM-based and TDMA-based are like the same thing, 'cuz I misread somethin' on the internets. Durrhhhhhhhhh." đ¤Ŗ
SystemShock said:
I'll have what you're smoking, if you honestly think LTE is anything like GSM. đ
"Durhhhhhhhhhh, OFDM-based and TDMA-based are like the same thing, 'cuz I misread somethin' on the internets. Durrhhhhhhhhh." đ¤Ŗ
Just reading your posts "cuz" "somthin" like duuuuude....leads me to believe waht I read on real tech sites are far far more credible than what you say....
Joe, c'mon, no one is this dumb. You're making me laugh so hard I'm tearing up. đ
SystemShock said:
:
Joe, c'mon, no one is this dumb. You're making me laugh so hard I'm tearing up. đ
Oh yeah Someone is indeed this dumb.....and he's laughing so hard he's "in tears"
"LTE is GSM... durhhhhhh...." đ¤Ŗ
Stop it Joe, yer killin' me! đ
Astronaut HS 88 said:
GSM will not EVER work on the CDMA network. LTE is NOT GSM, so your GSM handset will not work on LTE.
Your logic escapes me....
AT&T is similarly positioned (as Verizon) to switch to LTE and could for the first time allow roaming between its network and Verizon's, increasing the overall coverage between the two services. Customers from AT&T with LTE cellphones should also be able to port their phones to Verizon's newly open network without being locked to the latter provider's choice of software. However, the break will also isolate smaller carriers such as Alltel and Sprint, both of whom have either revealed no immediate plans beyond 3G (in the case of Alltel) or which have...
(continues)
By the end of 2007 Q1 GSM had: 94,365,408 subscribers in USA/Canada
http://www.gsmworld.com/news/statistics/pdf/gsma_sta ... »
By the end of 2007 Q1 CDMA had: 118,020,000 subscribers in USA/Canada
http://www.cdg.org/worldwide/archives/cdma_world_sub ... »
So if you are one the 118,020,000 (134,600,000 based on 3Q 2007) users, wouldn't you want to take your phone with you to another carrier?
GSM 3Q 2007 USA/Canada stats not available.
Sure there are more GSM users Worldwide but what does that have to do with Verizon?
I imagine there will be quick approvals added to the list.
If you think open access is all about phones... you're really missing the point.
If you think you are all going to individually submit handsets...you're really missing the point.
If you think this will happen in 2008...you're really drinking too much red kool-aid.
See Nokia Symbian.... can run software developed by anyone
See Mozilla
See Linux
See BT Many Java APIs use BT technology to do many things.
For Verizon true 'open access" would be the equivalent of being able to buy any Sprint or Alltel phone and use it on your Verizon account immediately
Verizon's idea of open access is to give them the new phone you just bought for a few weeks and let them "test" it....
I would imagine you would send out some type of device that hasn't been ever put on any type of network. Lets say you develop some kind of telementry device, like a squirrel tracking device or something, that would need to be tested, but handsets already approved by the FCC with all the specs already distributed, I couln't see those being an issue.
No one knows exactly what yet, so it's a wait and see thing for now.