LTE usage-based pricing
http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-envision ... »
Verizon Wireless likely will introduce a usage-based pricing model when it launches its LTE network in commercial markets later this year, a Verizon executive said, lending credence to the idea that wireless carriers will increasingly adopt the model in the future.
The pricing paradigm likely will shift because there will be so many devices that run on the LTE network that customers will not buy in Verizon's stores, Verizon Communications CTO Dick Lynch said. Instead, the company will probably introduce a pricing scheme in which customers will be charged a base rate for using the network on LTE-connected devices--including tablets and appliances--but will then charge customers based on how much bandwidth they use.
"The problem we have today with flat-based usage is that you are trying to encourage customers to be efficient in use and applications, but you are getting some people who are bandwidth hogs using gigabytes a month and they are paying something like megabytes a month," Lynch said in an interview with the Washington Post. "That isn't long-term sustainable. Why should customers using an average amount of bandwidth be subsidizing bandwidth hogs?"
The company plans on launching 25-30 commercial LTE markets this year, covering a total of 100 million POPs. It has not detailed any pricing plans for the network, but has said that network will provide average data speeds of 5-12 Mbps for downloads and 2-5 Mbps for uploads.
Lynch's comments are not entirely surprising. He made similar remarks at a broadband trade show in September, where he argued that metered broadband was going to eventually become a reality.
AT&T Mobility has said it will introduce incentives to get its customers to use wireless broadband more efficiently, though it has not said it will introduce usage-based pricing. Analysts have been speculating that more and more wireless operators will eventually go that route as data traffic keeps growing.
"If you look at what's happening today, they're being forced by necessity to adopt usage-based models," Phil Asmundson, Deloitte's vice chairman and leader of its U.S. technology, media and telecommunications group, told Telephony. "All-you-can-eat business models depend on your ability to predict how much data your customers will consume. The iPhone has proven that you can't make those kind of predictions."
Odds are that if you're reading this, your a usage hog like me. Better put in for that promotion at work, because you'll need it if you plan to start running your mobile data the way you abuse your DSL/cable connection right now!
I don't do P2P, Torrents, etc. The biggest draws for me are MMO's and hulu streaming.
Subsidized models high have a $20 or $30 monthly minimum to offset the subsidy on a smart phone, but the whole USB modem world needs a little shake up IMO. Those little things have no screen, no speaker and no microphone. Cost of materials to build those things in large quantities is probably only $40 a pop...
(continues)
It was the speculation and confirmation of the multitude of devices.
Let's see... say mycool, inc. owns 50 vending machines. And, say I want to attach a modem to them to transmit data (small amounts) so that the machine can alert me when it runs low on change, needs a refill, or has a malfunction.
Today I am limited in choices:
* Modem for each machine @ $39.99 (lowest cost option) - 50 MB = 2000/month!
* Telemetry data isn't as expensive (I don't know the rates), but the data isn't fast and it's still not as good of a price (last I remember). And, I have to purchase a separate modem and try to make everything work together! Holy cow that stinks!
LTE / Open Network:
I upgrade m...
(continues)
I'd probably be able to predict my usage, probably never more than 50GB's in a single month, lots of Hulu, lots of news clips & porn.
These companies don't understand, this isn't the 90's anymore! ! !
These companies don't understand, this isn't the 90's anymore! ! !
Um, I think they do. 😲
Wireless carriers in the U.S. are very interested in selling adult content, but they need to figure out how to do it without making their stockholders panic, said Farley Cahen, vice president for new media at adult publishing house Digital Playground.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2357934,00.asp »
Personally I think 40-50GB's/mo would be sufficent for me.
Whatever they end up pricing it at the speed better justify the price. The faster it is, the more I'd be willing to pay.
What I think is funny is that verizon can announce tiered pricing and the fanboys don't balk like they did when there was a rumor that at&t might tier their data rates. They both would be doing it to properly bill according to usage.
AT&T wanted to do it to the iPhone user community who already own the devices and wouldn't have any alternative choice in the matter.
Jayshmay said:
Well doesn't 4G have a lot more capacity? Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO).
Personally I think 40-50GB's/mo would be sufficent for me.
Whatever they end up pricing it at the speed better justify the price. The faster it is, the more I'd be willing to pay.
Do not confuse capacity and speed with cost effectiveness! While even conservative numbers put LTE performing 10x as fast as a good EVDO rev A. connection, the actual cost savings is NOT 10x or anywhere near it!
The best estimates I've seen for cost of operation (after all the towers are paid for) is a 50% reduction in cost-per-MB to deliver 4G wireless compared to 3G wireless data.
That means that a 10x increase in usage...
(continues)
😎