Verizon Owned the Quarter. Now What?
My question is, where does Verizon go from here? Do they need to step it up a notch and make some changes (for example, some marketable way to deal with overages, a la F&F or Rollover?), or is it really a case of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it?".
The 2Q results really blew me away. Knew they'd do good, didn't think they could do THAT good. 😳
Now on Cingular's side of things, they still had a brilliant quarter. Others will say that Cingular is 'headed back to business as usual', but I think that's totally wrong. They had more than a million adds again. Reduced churn again. ARPU was up over last quarter also. The most important thing Cingular managed to do was make a profit. How many years was it supposed to take for that to happen? Net adds was the only metric that wasn't better than last quarter.
Th...
(continues)
Al_Swearengen said:
There's not much to say except that Verizon did indeed blow everyone out of the water this quarter in adds. Churn was still low, but didn't it go up from last quarter? I thought it was 1.1% last quarter.
Verizon's churn did not go up. Amazingly, in fact, they REDUCED churn further, from 1.3% overall in the 1st quarter to 1.2% overall in the 2nd.
The 1.1% figure you're thinking of from the previous quarter was for postpaid only. Verizon's postpaid-only churn actually dropped further to 1.0% this quarter, which is... well, damn. 😳
Awesome job no matter what the churn was. That many net adds is impressive
Thanks for the kind words.
Now on...
(continues)
Theyre on such a roll that I think even the Radio Shack thing isnt going to hurt. The corp stores are stepping it up and were taking share away from Radio Shack (another reason why they left), and with the big electronics stores in the picture too I just dont think RS will be missed. Maybe for the first couple of months, until everyone clues in that you dont go to RS to get Verizon anymore.
Not that I had any use for them anyway. Last time I was there their guys didnt even know that they had some new Samsungs in the back ready for sale (p...
(continues)
I know they are just doing their job, but if I say I don't want help, leave me alone until I ask for help.
Awesome job no matter what the churn was. That many net adds is impressive
Thanks for the kind words.
Al's Reply: No problem, but the kind words were for Verizon, not you. Unless, of course, you work for Verizon...
...Now on Cingular's side of things, they still had a brilliant quarter. Others will say that Cingular is 'headed back to business as usual', but I think that's totally wrong. They had more than a million adds again.
Gosh Al, I hate to say this after your kind words about Verizon, but I think most ppl thought Cingy had a disappointing quarter, adds-wise.
Analysts' consensus was that they'd come in at 1.25 million, they missed that by
(continues)
Al_Swearengen said:
Al's Reply: No problem, but the kind words were for Verizon, not you. Unless, of course, you work for Verizon...
I don't. I use the term "kind words" because we always seem to be on opposite sides of the Verizon vs Cingular debate, and I think its nice that you're capable of congratulating Verizon on their awesome quarter.
Al's Reply: So what's your point? I wasn't comparing Verizon to Cingular.
I wasn't strictly comparing Verizon to Cingular either. I was also comparing Cingy's performance to what was expected of them. In that regard, they fell short in the adds department. Not my opinion, simply what was reported.
I was pointing out how w...
(continues)
BetterThanJake said:
I wasn't strictly comparing Verizon to Cingular either.
...
Let's face it Al... Verizon simply had a much better quarter than Cingy. Feel free to disagree, but you'll be in the minority.
This is usually when you and I have problems. You speak out of both sides.
I never once said Cingular had a better quarter than Verizon. I said that they both had strong quarters.
If you look at the media, they also say that Cingular had strong quarter despite the drop in adds.
...That's pretty normal stuff for Verizon. They didn't do anything spectacular, just business as usual.
Really>? Its my understanding that their 1.9 million adds in the quart
(continues)
my name is steven from jakarta indonesia
and recently i bought an audiovox 6600 woc from the states and it has verizon stamped on it
but since i'm using it in jakarta indonesia
i was wondering if you could help me solve my problem
see i want to inject a telephone number using my country's mobile company and they can't figure how to set the thing so i can use their sevices
acn you suggest what to do or even better tell me how to set the audiovox so i can use the phone line here in jakarta cause the one in my pda is the verizon service
or maybe you can suggest someone who knows? that'll be a great help
thanks in advance
Al_Swearengen said:
This is usually when you and I have problems. You speak out of both sides.
Nah. You like to spin things a certain way, while I see things differently. It's called a disagreement, and there really isn't anything duplicitous about it.
I never once said Cingular had a better quarter than Verizon. I said that they both had strong quarters.
If you look at the media, they also say that Cingular had strong quarter despite the drop in adds.
We read different media, then:
Cingular Stumbles on Sub Growth
Cingular's subscriber growth stumbled in the second quarter as the company narrowly topped the 1 million net new user mark.
The Atlanta-based w ...
(continues)
BetterThanJake said:
Nah. You like to spin things a certain way, while I see things differently. It's called a disagreement, and there really isn't anything duplicitous about it.
Um. You said you weren't comparing Cingular and Verizon, then backed up your argument by saying that Verizon had a better quarter than Cingular.
That's the very definition of duplicitous.
Btw... You never spin the facts to match you opinion. 🤣
We read different media, then:
http://www.thestreet.com/_tsclsii/tech/scottmoritz/1 ... »
Yeah, we do read different media:
http://money.cnn.com/services/tickerheadlines/prn/20 ... »
That's what ...
(continues)
Al_Swearengen said:
Um. You said you weren't comparing Cingular and Verizon, then backed up your argument by saying that Verizon had a better quarter than Cingular.
That's the very definition of duplicitous.
No, I said I wasn't "strictly comparing" the two. I compared Cingy's performance both to Verizon AND to what the expectations for Cingy were. By both measures, they didn't so good in 2Q. It happens. No need to try to twist my words to make an untrue accusation, or put a spin on it... just do better next time. Yeesh. 😕
We read different media, then:
http://www.thestreet.com/_tsclsii/tech/scottmoritz/1 ... »
Yeah, we do read different media:
http://money. »...
(continues)
No need to try to twist my words to make an untrue accusation, or put a spin on it...
You've got to be kidding me. Were you looking in the mirror when you typed that? You, sir are the best spin doctor that's ever been on any forum. Neither I nor anyone else holds a candle, brotha. I bow before your might.
ROLFMAO! Did you catch this line in your article, dear sir?:
ATLANTA (PRNewswire)
PRNewswire is a press release news service. "Information direct from the sources" as it were. CNN Money basically printed Cingular's press release. The very definition of something that is NOT unbiased. C'mon Al.
Well, jake you got me there. Thought that was an honest mistake. I am just getti...
(continues)
Al_Swearengen said:
You've got to be kidding me. Were you looking in the mirror when you typed that? You, sir are the best spin doctor that's ever been on any forum. Neither I nor anyone else holds a candle, brotha. I bow before your might.
LOL... I'm not that powerful, Al. I simply post news articles from time to time and analyze them a little. There's little if any spin involved... unless one does not like what the news is saying. I can't take any responsibility for that, that's on the reader.
...ROLFMAO! Did you catch this line in your article, dear sir?:
ATLANTA (PRNewswire)
PRNewswire is a press release news service. "Information direct from the sources" as it were. CNN
(continues)
...BetterThanJake said:Al_Swearengen said:
You've got to be kidding me. Were you looking in the mirror when you typed that? You, sir are the best spin doctor that's ever been on any forum. Neither I nor anyone else holds a candle, brotha. I bow before your might.
LOL... I'm not that powerful, Al. I simply post news articles from time to time and analyze them a little. There's little if any spin involved... unless one does not like what the news is saying. I can't take any responsibility for that, that's on the reader.
That's just simply not true. You read the articles that you like the sound of and quote them like they are the gospel. Then use them to back up you
(continues)
Al_Swearengen said:...BetterThanJake said:Al_Swearengen said:
You've got to be kidding me. Were you looking in the mirror when you typed that? You, sir are the best spin doctor that's ever been on any forum. Neither I nor anyone else holds a candle, brotha. I bow before your might.
LOL... I'm not that powerful, Al. I simply post news articles from time to time and analyze them a little. There's little if any spin involved... unless one does not like what the news is saying. I can't take any responsibility for that, that's on the reader.
That's just simply not true. You read the articles that you like the sound of and quote them like they are
(continues)
gunny said:...Al_Swearengen said:BetterThanJake said:Al_Swearengen said:
You've got to be kidding me. Were you looking in the mirror when you typed that? You, sir are the best spin doctor that's ever been on any forum. Neither I nor anyone else holds a candle, brotha. I bow before your might.
LOL... I'm not that powerful, Al. I simply post news articles from time to time and analyze them a little. There's little if any spin involved... unless one does not like what the news is saying. I can't take any responsibility for that, that's on the reader.
That's just simply not true. You read the articles that you like the sound
(continues)
Yeah Al, we could debate until we're blue in the fact but the fact is, you adamantly believe that the media (and me) is somehow 'biased' against poor Cingy, while I whole-heartedly reject that notion.
Which means that I'm just going to keep on doing what I do and saying what I say, and you're going to keep complaining about it. Ah well... good to know that some things in life are certain. 😉
Paradyne said:
When looking at Verizon's quarterly reports keep this in mind...had you invested $10,000 in VZ 5 years ago, your investment would be worth less than $7,000 today. In fact, Verizon's share price has been on a down-hill-slide for the past year. Their phones are ok but their stock is dismal.
The telco sector in general hasn't been a good place to keep one's money. Lots of competition, and new technologies destroying old ones daily. Still, could be worse... you could've invested in SBC for that five-year period:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=VZ&l=on&z=m&q=l ... »
Or, lord help you, Comcast:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=VZ&l=on&z=m&q=l ... »
chinocooks said:
Just my $.02 worth.. keep in mind that Broadband/EVDO is still in "soft-launch" phase. Mass advertising has not begun for this yet. As Wireless Week put it, it seems that VZW is waiting until the majority of metropolitan areas have deployed EVDO service before the BIG announcement is made.
That's a good point, and an argument for the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" point of view. With VZW being so far ahead in 3G deployment, that's something they can increasingly make hay of in their marketing if they so wish.
Its not necessarily something that'll make the average consumer swoon, but they could snag more and more business users and 'power users'. 🙂