EFT/administration charge effective 10-01-05
poloco65 said:
just got off the phone with CS and they said you can opt out of your contract with no eft!!and keep the phone to sell on ebay or do whatever with,plus she said there is no time limit to come back meaning you can get a new phone at discount,now my question is,why would vzw do this when all they got to do is waive the .40 charge saving them money,weird....what am i missing here LOL
I think that charge is imposed on them. Could you imagine waiving those $.40 every month? Let's see: VZW has what? 47.5 million custs? Let's see. 47.5 x $.40 = $19 million a month. If I'm doing my numbers right. I don't think they'll want to lose 19 million dollars a month
Your acct will remain in standby for 6 mo's so you can come back. Also, just so everyone understands this fee has been being covered by Vzw for years. The US govt charges larger co. a tax that is used to pay for things like internet in schools and libraries things like that. So this is where the .40 is going to it's not going to our CEO or anything like that. Other companies have been charging this fee to their customers for years so I guess it's about time we caught I for one will not be canceling so that I can cont...
(continues)
freedomrep said:...
I also talked to my Vzw rep. and yes if you wanna leave Vzw you can!No ETF! No you cannot come back 2morow and get a new act. pricing on equipment! yes, you can port your # anywhere and NO we will not waive the fee to keep you!
Your acct will remain in standby for 6 mo's so you can come back. Also, just so everyone understands this fee has been being covered by Vzw for years. The US govt charges larger co. a tax that is used to pay for things like internet in schools and libraries things like that. So this is where the .40 is going to it's not going to our CEO or anything like that. Other companies have been charging this fee to their customers for years so I guess it's about time we caught I for one wil
(continues)
Vox Dei said:
No this is not a tax to the subsciber. It is an admistration fee that Verizon uses to pay the taxes it is charged by the government. Alot of carriers are adding a simular fee (or have added) to cover there costs.
Did you read the post? VZW passes along all taxes and they are listed as such. This is NOT a fee to cover taxes charged by the Gov. It is a fee to cover VZW cost of doing business, which one would think that they would price their plans accordingly to cover.
However in the numbers game it looks better to say that you are getting a package for 59.99 then have it show up as 74.38 on the bill than telling the customer the exact cost up front. (example not an actual price pl...
(continues)
(i) fees and assessments on network facilities and services,
such as licensing fees for towers and network which are charged by the FCC. My info is not wrong. This is not fees charged to user these are fees charged to carriers.
Vox Dei said:
Never once said anything about being mandated by the government. Infact i said just the oposite. I said it is a fee CHARGED BY VERIZON (not charged by the government never once said this fee was charge or mandated or in any way required by any government agency). One of the uses of the money this fee is collected for is to pay for certian fees (i will now quote your post)
(i) fees and assessments on network facilities and services,
such as licensing fees for towers and network which are charged by the FCC. My info is not wrong. This is not fees charged to user these are fees charged to carriers.
I have covered this in other post and don't feel like doing it again.
Vox Dei said:
...
(continues)
freedomrep said:
Basically, all other carriers have these type of fees Vzw be the cheapest! Damn, we said we would let you out the contract! What more explanation do you need. Vzw is charging an additional .40 to your bill if you don't like it you can leave! Simple! It doesn't really matter why we are charging it! We just are!
I never said it matters why the charge is there or that others or I should cancel. I never said that I need an explanation either. I simply want people to know what the charge is instead of them being given incorrect information from people like you about what the charge is. There is no reason to be so rude or defensive, just be honest and accurate.
I was addressing the issue for ...
(continues)
(continues)
All charges assessed on or passed to VZW by the Gov are passed to the customer and are listed as such on the bill as: "Taxes, governmental surcharges and fees 4.42"
This charge has nothing to do with the Gov according to the statement VZW put on the bills.
Verizon Wireless will begin assessing an "Administrative Charge" of $0.40 per line per month on October 1, 2005. This charge will help defray certain costs we incur, currently including: (i) fees and assessments on network facilities and services, (ii) charges we, or our agents, pay local telephone companies for delivering calls from our customers to their customers, and (iii) certain costs...
(continues)
So I guess there is no way the fees and assessments could have come from the govt. Nowhere in there does it not say the govt is doing excatly what I stated. I've checked with everyone I can and been told the same thing by all of them!people that would know the right answer!!!so unless I start calling Bedminsiter I have went as far up as I can. The govt places taxes on large corp. for things like internet in schools etc. Vzw has been absorbing this charge for years they are now passing it on!
There are four components to the Federal Universal Service Fund. They are:
Low-Income. This program provides telephone service discounts to consumers with qualifying low-incomes.
High-Cost. This program provides financial support to companies that provide telecommunications services in areas of America where the cost of providing service is high.
Schools and Libraries. This program helps to ensure that the nation's classrooms and libraries receive access to the vast array of educational resources that are accessible through the telecommunications network.
...
(continues)
freedomrep said:
I am not even trying to read all of that! I'm done with this discussion. You can be right I give up