Be nice to Fo'syth. I don' think he's a victim of the CRAZR bandwagon effect.

No, I fell victim to the bandwagon effect on the original V3 and I was highly disappointed. I will NOT be duped twice. I still want my Samsung a970!!!!

SForsyth01 said:
No, I fell victim to the bandwagon effect on the original V3 and I was highly disappointed. I will NOT be duped twice. I still want my Samsung a970!!!!

Hum, thas' weird, 'cus on the Cingular forum you're talkin' 'bout your V3i love.

Looks like the V3 done gotcha again. 🙂

Oh, n' if you still into the A970, someone on this forum mentioned a $50 price drop on that phone happenin' this week sometime? Or maybe it already did yesterday? Don' know which stores.

I want the V3i because it has a memory card slot and iTunes. Two MAJOR features that the V3c does not have. And I need to do something because the lag in the original V3 is driving me nuts. And, as much as I love the functionality of the S710a, it is just too bulky.

I thought they said the V3i wasn't going to have iTunes now. 😕

Check out the main phonescoop news page about the RAZR. The V3i will have iTunes.

Cool. Just seemed like they were going back and forth on that. One article would say it was going to have iTunes and another would say that it wouldn't. I'm in the let's wait and see group. For now it looks good, but all we can do is wait for the release. Hope it ends up with it I guess. I more of an generic MP3 user, rather than an Apple iTunes MP3 user.

iTunes was never really in question, once the ROKR came out. What was in question for the GSM model is EDGE, which it will not have.

I know that EDGE was in question as well. But I know what I read. iTunes was a question mark for sometime. All the pictures of the prototype showed iTunes, but there were quoted questions on iTunes. Doesn't really matter in the end. I can't get this phone until hell freezes over or I change from T-Mobile to Cingular.... 🙂

Lol. Ok I will be nice just for you, even though he isn’t nice to me. 🙂

The ceo of Motorola, actually mentioned it on CNBC some time back regarding the new razr for verizon wireless and I think I actually mentioned that in a post here, but I don’t remember exactly.

🙂

amagorno said:
Actually, no that was the Korean version that didn't have BT and was called the MS500. This is the one we here in the US had rumors on, but no official information release. The V3c has some better features compared to the MS500 that was listed in that article.

I don' know amag, the article seems pretty clear on the fact that Motorola announced they were workin' on a *USA* version of CDMA RAZR:

Date Posted: Mar 16, 2005, 1:05 PM
Source: Motorola

Tuesday night Motorola announced they are working on a version of RAZR phone for the US. It appears slightly thicker than the GSM however it improves on that model by upgrading the camera to 1 Megapixel. The CDMA RAZR is due out in ...
(continues)

There is some truth to what you say, but again, the phone they had here was the MS500. The phone we are seeing now is not the same phone they were mentioning. The phone delivered to Asia:

Tuesday night Motorola announced they are working on a version of RAZR phone for the US. It appears slightly thicker than the GSM however it improves on that model by upgrading the camera to 1 Megapixel. The CDMA RAZR is due out in Asia around the middle of this year and in the US by the end of the year or early 2006. Motorola also announced the v323, an entry-level clamshell with dual displays, and the V266p , a flip phone with a VGA camera and Push to Talk.

Is the one they originally thought would be delivered here. The V3c is a different p ...
(continues)

Sry, I can only go by what the article said:

Tuesday night Motorola announced they are working on a version of RAZR phone for the US

If the article is wrong, then it should definintely be brought to the attention o' the folks who wrote it.

That's why I highlighted the Asia delivery of this phone. The V3c is not the phone that was delivered to Asia first as referenced in this article, that phone was the MS500. So, I am not saying the article is wrong, I am just saying it was refering to the MS500, not the V3c. Both of which are on the motorola web site. 🙂

Ah, but if dat's the case, then the article WOULD be wrong.

It wouldn't be wrong sayin' that Motorola was workin' on a CDMA RAZR fo' the US (they were), but it would be wrong in sayin' that Motorola ANNOUNCED dat they were.

In which case, you should definitely contact the writers an' tell 'em to correct it.

You lost me on that one... 😕

I know, its confusin' fo' me too..

What I'm sayin' is, the article is WRONG because

1. The article said that Motorola annouced that it was working on a *USA* CDMA RAZR

2. Yes, Motorola DEFINITELY was working on a *USA* CDMA RAZR, but HOWEVER

3. Motorola did not ANNOUNCE the fact that they were doing so (even though they were doing so)

See, there's a difference between working on something, and ANNOUCING that you're working on somethin'.

Get it now?

Uh, uh. Can we just stop now? I my brain is starting to hurt....... 😕

What I'm tryin' to tell ya is that you're right. I think. 😕

We're both right. Much like Albert Einstein and Steven Falkner. All depends on the bounding of reality..... 😁

Ooops, I meant Steven Hawking.

It looks like you. You said gunny would lose control,he relpied do you think hes creaming again?(in his pants?)

He said "she." Gunny is a "he."

Maybe he/she was confused?

😕 gunny is a he? 😲 whoa i didn't know. sorry

Don't feel too bad, it's not like they have gender marker on this forum. There are a lot of guys on here that I that thought might have been women by some of their posts and they weren't. 🤣