Radio Shack & Cingular
http://today.reuters.com/business/newsarticle.aspx?t ... »
This line of the article is so important as it points out Radio Shack's lack of brains: WHY CUT OUT A LONG TIME ALLY? Especially a wonderful one such as VZW???????
I hope Cingular takes a big hit from this, that and Sprint too. Then Verizon will again be number one, and T-Mobile can be number two, and Cingular and Sprint can eat thier dust!
🤣 🤣
sowhatsowhat10 said:
lefty i know your a t-mobile fan..........................BUT ITS NOT HAPPENIN!!!!!!!!!
🤣 🤣
Haveta agree here.
While there's a very good chance that Verizon will pass Cingular for the #1 spot by year's end, there's really no way T-Mobile will ever be bigger than #4, except through some sort of fantasy Cingular-Tmobile merger that regulators would be unlikely to approve (and if they did, they might as well let a Verizon-Sprint-Nextel merge go through too... only two nationals, woohoo. Not.)
Even if T-M made size a big priority and bought up all the remaining GSM regionals AND had a bust-out year customer adds-wise, they'd still be a distant fourth size-wise. They really...
(continues)
SystemShock said:...sowhatsowhat10 said:
lefty i know your a t-mobile fan..........................BUT ITS NOT HAPPENIN!!!!!!!!!
🤣 🤣
Haveta agree here.
While there's a very good chance that Verizon will pass Cingular for the #1 spot by year's end, there's really no way T-Mobile will ever be bigger than #4, except through some sort of fantasy Cingular-Tmobile merger that regulators would be unlikely to approve (and if they did, they might as well let a Verizon-Sprint-Nextel merge go through too... only two nationals, woohoo. Not.)
Even if T-M made size a big priority and bought up all the remaining GSM regionals AND had a bust-out year customer adds-wise, they'd still be a
(continues)
I could care less if T-Mobile is number 2, 3, 4, or number 532. As long as I have my talk time. :-)
Oh and may Verizon stomp Cingular in the ground!
Does Joe consumer REALLY care what is going on at corporate for Radio Shack?
Did Radio Shack suddenly FORGET how to sell wireless service when they went to Cingular?
The loss was due to a write off of millions of $$ in Verizon phones. Many stores were low or out of stock come Christmas and afterwards to minimize the potential loss. This was discussed by analyists when the changeover was announced and WAS NOT unexpected. If you track store performance in those markets where they ALREADY sold Cingular they did just fine.
The other areas of loss HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WIRELESS.
texaswireless said:
For those with a logical approach rather than a flamer approach think about this:
Does Joe consumer REALLY care what is going on at corporate for Radio Shack?
Did Radio Shack suddenly FORGET how to sell wireless service when they went to Cingular?
The loss was due to a write off of millions of $$ in Verizon phones. Many stores were low or out of stock come Christmas and afterwards to minimize the potential loss. This was discussed by analyists when the changeover was announced and WAS NOT unexpected. If you track store performance in those markets where they ALREADY sold Cingular they did just fine.
The other areas of loss HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WIRELESS.
My friend, that...
(continues)
I've been through this on a much smaller scale. Switching carriers is a double edge sword. Do you keep inventory levels up and maintain high levels of activations up to the end OR do you stop ordering inventory and hope the new carrier signing bonus makes up for the month of lost sales.
Radio Shack, on a per store basis, is not a big player. But on economies of scale, they are huge. Even with the store cuts, 6300-6500 stores is nothi...
(continues)