The 'Lame Phone' question.....
Again, this is not meant to stir anything up but to find out what I am not seeing in as far as 'lame'.
For the record, I will assume that part of the lame factor is due to the UI. I may not agree but I do understand that many have a disdain for the UI so I will take this as a given.
Any and all, please define lame vs cool by comparison ordescription. Either will do.
I would define a lame phone as one that has no features and poor call quality.
Green Jeep said:
Any and all, please define lame vs cool by comparison ordescription. Either will do.
Lame phone? One you can't make a call on.
I'd say poor reception = lame phone. 'Cuz then "that s**t's broke!". âšī¸
chris
he was far from hatin on apple. đ
sowhatsowhat10 said:
đ i thought he was giving apple props. and how does using a PC anytime piss you off.
he was far from hatin on apple. đ
I have to use a thinkpad for work, and I have an apple for personal use. And the apple is so much more intuitive. PC's just seem light years behing in terms of ease of use...and he might have been giving apple a little bit of props, but i thought he was saying that apples were just a pretty shell, with nothing on the inside...to each his own I guess.
Anyways to get back on topic a tough...I have to agree with gunny..."cool" phones are phones that are innovative and push boundaries...The samsung blade, the slvr, samsung 809, phones like these are described ...
(continues)
Just my .02 cents
Carry On đ