What happen to "FREE SPEECH" ?????????????
So it seems like if you disagree with what everyone thinks, censorship kicks in?
Since when is phonescoop and Verizon part of the cold war theology?
I am disappointed with this website and Mr. Rich A. Brome.
Scandal said:
Sometime last night(thursday) a person z1 made a comment, and even he said, the "moderator" would most likely "kill" his thread. And I see today what he said is no longer on here.
So it seems like if you disagree with what everyone thinks, censorship kicks in?
Since when is phonescoop and Verizon part of the cold war theology?
I am disappointed with this website and Mr. Rich A. Brome.
It's Rich's site. He can do what he wants to.
Scandal said:Maybe Richard A. Brome doesn't like idiots? This IS his website, you know.
Sometime last night(thursday) a person z1 made a comment, and even he said, the "moderator" would most likely "kill" his thread. And I see today what he said is no longer on here.
So it seems like if you disagree with what everyone thinks, censorship kicks in?
Since when is phonescoop and Verizon part of the cold war theology?
I am disappointed with this website and Mr. Rich A. Brome.
Scandal said:
Hey muchdrama, aren't you one of the "11" that z1 mention last night?
We are the "Council of 11".
Aside: I have no idea what was posted and then removed, just my 2-cents I like to throw out there when ever someone try to pull "freedom of speech"
(continues)
I do have a brain, I do use to my advantage.
But as I looked at some of the past threads about my post, the phonescoop "11" proved my point.
You don't have to be smart to post here, you have to beable to type.
And yes, I'm sure once "again" the powers that be, will once again remove my thread. thus proving once again, your post can only stay on here if you agree to argue who's better GSM or CDMA. Who really cares? If you get a signal and can make a call, THAT IS WHAT REALLY MATTERS! Not bluetooth, kps, etc....
Go ahead Rich remove this thread, and you'll prove my point, that this is a very bias website.
No hate involved, just facts.
Is it bias in the sense that negatively speaking about people is not allowed? However, you can correct people's post, and if you want too make a little fun of it. If you want to bash people go to yahoo chat.
Yes, their is a lot of misinformation out their and on this webiste, but that's bound to happen when you put a bunch of people in one place, no matter how you plan it. I think Rich is currently in the process of requiring a prerequisite test about the wireless industry before becoming a memeber.
That's the whole purposes of forums to get the correct information; there will be some wrong info given but it will iron itself out given time.
z1 said:...
I do NOT hate anyone nor am I jealous of those who are on here.
I do have a brain, I do use to my advantage.
But as I looked at some of the past threads about my post, the phonescoop "11" proved my point.
You don't have to be smart to post here, you have to beable to type.
And yes, I'm sure once "again" the powers that be, will once again remove my thread. thus proving once again, your post can only stay on here if you agree to argue who's better GSM or CDMA. Who really cares? If you get a signal and can make a call, THAT IS WHAT REALLY MATTERS! Not bluetooth, kps, etc....
Go ahead Rich remove this thread, and you'll prove my point, that this is a very bias website.
No hate involved, just
(continues)
All the information presented is derived from somewhere else and personal experience which may or may not contain an inherent bias. I find some members credible and some not based on the tenor of the posts and information presented which either agrees or disagrees with information I may have gained from various sources themselves possibly being biased.
Personal attack is a part of any forum wi...
(continues)
kingfrog77 said:...
I initially came to this forum because I was informed it was not biased toward any Carrier or censored. A forum is only as good as it's keeper. just like a newspaper. Credibility is highest when people can express opinions as fact and debate such. Credibility is only assigned to those and by those who read numerous posts by a particular member.
All the information presented is derived from somewhere else and personal experience which may or may not contain an inherent bias. I find some members credible and some not based on the tenor of the posts and information presented which either agrees or disagrees with information I may have gained from various sources themselves possibly being biased.
Pers
(continues)