Cool. So VZW should be hands down since T-Mobile's coverage is weak at best.

crazyeaglefan236 said:
Cool. So VZW should be hands down since T-Mobile's coverage is weak at best.

So, where's the VZW web site coverage map that actually shows REAL coverage at street level? All I can find is this stupidy static map which is A) pretty optimistic looking considering what I know of my area from having VZW service for three years and B) is virtually indistinguishable from the interactive, real time, accurate TMobile map footprint. The only points of difference are in areas that I term, charitably, as "optimistic."

We also don't score as a "weak" network in any of the major markets, where we're either #1 or tied for first place across the board according to independent testing organiza...
(continues)

nope t-mobile sucks and so does their WEAK network. I live in T-mobile headquarters, Bellevue WA and they blow bad tried them twice, with the same WEAK results 🤣 troll elsewhere

gunny said:
nope t-mobile sucks and so does their WEAK network. I live in T-mobile headquarters, Bellevue WA and they blow bad tried them twice, with the same WEAK results 🤣 troll elsewhere

Oh, how silly of me to forget that it is YOU and YOU ONLY who determine the absolute integrity of any and all wireless carrier networks from your world headquarters in BFE. What WAS I thinking? 🙄

As for trolling, kindly remember that every time you point a finger at someone else, you're pointing three back at yourself. Or is that too introspective for you?

Give the guy credit though.. Tmo is great as long as you wear a tinfoil hat and don't leave 405..

I don't think it was as introspective as it was immature.

I've had T-Mobile along with too many other people and yep, they suck here too and we're a major market. Their map says I get services at my home when um no I don't so what did you call that map again?