EVDO vs EDGE
Isn't EDGE the same speed as 1xRTT?
I kinda find it funny when people complain that the phone doesn't have EDGE.
In my opinion, that would put some of the other carriers like 4 years behind VZW, right?
Tell me your thoughts on this matter.
It would be correct in saying that EDGE and GRPS are similar speeds to 1xrtt.
I would not say 4 years behind Verizon and Sprint but it puts them at least 1 year behind them. Problem is, T-Mobile cannot deploy any 3g network as it does not have 3g spectrum, but Cingular is currently deploying UMTS/HSDPA that will be in competition with DO. Will it succeed? Time will tell, but right now, DO has been doing a lot better than UMTS/HSDPA. Obviously, Cingular’s roll out is only in 20 or so markets so it is quite young but evidence shows us so far that DO will outperfo...
(continues)
My average for my EV-DO pc-cards are 900kb/s reaching up to 1mb/s. On the cellular edge, with a -105DB, I get around 700kb/s. By the way, this is only REV O speeds, REV A speeds will drive the numbers higher.
I think HSDPA, if the testing is true and does well in “real life”, it should be very competitive against DO REV A, but remember, there must be pc-cards and phones that can achieve the 14.4mb/s that was theoretically reached. I doubt we will seek that 14.4mb/s, but I think we will see from 1-4mb/s again depending on what pc-cards and phones there are and the speeds to support it.
UMTS/WCDMA is actually supposed to be peak download at 2mb/s with average speeds of 220-320kb/s.
Actually, HSDPA speeds are targeted to be from; “will support peak
theoretical rate of 14 Mbps and average throughput rates experienced by users of
between 550-1100 kbps.” Therefore, as you can see, DO REV A and HSDPA will be competing nicely against each other.
REV O is supposed to be peak download at 2.4mb/s with average of 400-700kb/s, while REV A’s peak will be at 3.1mb/s with average over ...
(continues)
PC-cards while in motion seems to be handling the speeds quite well and even going at 60mph I was still able to obtain a minimum speed of 900kb/s. Obviously when there is lesser coverage I obtained lesser speeds but still pretty good. (700kb/s)
(That is common with all wireless technologies)
With the phones, I have been seeing a bit lesser speeds then what I was able to obtain on my pc-cards, and on the road either going 20mph or 60mph it seemed to me that speeds were decreasing, but it was not that bad and I did not lose any connection. (I do not remember what the speeds were but they were pretty close to the pc-cards. Next time I run my tests, i...
(continues)
However, I have not talked to other people who are in more favorable areas for Verizon Wireless through...
(continues)
Edge is faster than 1xRTT. And EDGE is considered by many (not me) as a 3G technology.
The difference in speeds:
1xRTT = The initial release - release 0 (zero) - supports data speeds peaking at 144 kbps. Typical real-world speeds are closer to 60-80 kbps. (Verizon skipped "1xRTT release A" and went ahead a released EV-DO) 1xRTT release A would had promised rates up to 288Kbps, but verizon didn't want to upgrade to this and chose EV-DO)
EDGE = Although many EDGE phones and devices are theoretically capable of up to 236 Kbps, most EDGE networks are only configured to allow up to 135 Kbps, to conserve spectrum resources. (This is subject to revision since I have reached over 195Kbps on my w600i)
...
(continues)