A question for the Brightest VZ Service Man
So that means your supervisor is an idiot.
Keep doing *22890 Dave. It'll save you the extra headache of pressing the program button (and possibly selling something else with the phone)
If your supervisor comes up with a concrete reason that 22890 is bad let us know?
that's great information. The earpiece story seems to be the most likely. He was told in a T3 meeting that 90 was for data products only. If I used 90 for handsets it would program incorrectly.
So I can explain a consiece shortcut to updating a phone to my customers.
The problem is many people don't even know about *228.
Verizon needs to put neon stickers on the boxes about this, cause I would say 75% of Verizon Customers I come accross don't know anything about a PRL update.
wonderdave said:
If the customer is a Port In with a different MIN that causes a problem because *228 programs MIN to be the same as MDN.
Ummm, no. Maybe in your area it does, but most of the country, if the MIN & MDN are different, the net will program it as such.
AND it's not always port-ins with different MIN/MDN combos. In one NPA/NXX, I've been seeing mismatched MIN/MDNs (on non-ported lines) in the past few days, for some reason. I'm guessing the prefix is getting near 100% full (10K numbers... time for another one... 🙂 )