NY Times Article
"AT&T’s share of new monthly wireless subscribers has fallen steadily over the last year, notably since it purchased BellSouth and changed its wireless brand to AT&T from Cingular. In the second quarter of last year, 29.5 percent of new cellphone subscribers chose AT&T, but that figure was 25.8 percent in this year’s first quarter, Mr. Hodulik said.
At the end of the first quarter, AT&T had 62.2 million subscribers, slightly more than Verizon’s 61.5 million, said Jonathan Atkin, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. But Verizon is catching up a little bit each quarter.
AT&T is already doing worse than Verizon in terms of customer turnover, or churn, Mr. Atkin said. AT&T is now losing ...
(continues)
Verizons burden is that they've never had a phone that would make people talk about it the way we've talked about the iPhone... When was it that they had to hire almost 2,000 people in order to help out with sales? When was it that they had customers lining up outside their stores in order to buy their equipment? How about NEVER?
(google it, cause you probably have know idea what Im talking about)
f38urry said:
An excerpt from a June 23, 2007 NY Times article:
"He said he was not concerned that consumers would balk at the price of the iPhone, which costs $499 or $599, depending on how much memory it has. The phones require a two-year service contract and, unlike most other phones AT&T offers, it will not be subsidized by the company.
AT&T's hubris may be its own downfall. Perhaps also the downfall of the iPhone. I just came back from a COR store to ask about new price plans and the individual insisted that the existing price plans would be it for the iPhone, there would be no new price plans and the phone was already subsidized. We all know the phone isn't subsidized but the lack of in...
(continues)
This is not isolated to AT&T (misinformation about a new product). Browse any other carrier forum and you will see the same complaints.