Time Magazine Invention of the Year
Stop. I mean, don't stop reading this, but stop thinking what you're about to think. Or, O.K., I'll think it for you:
The thing is hard to type on. It's too slow. It's too big. It doesn't have instant messaging. It's too expensive. (Or, no, wait, it's too cheap!) It doesn't support my work e-mail. It's locked to AT&T. Steve Jobs secretly hates puppies. And—all together now—we're sick of hearing about it! Yes, there's been a lot of hype written about the iPhone, and a lot of guff too. So much so that it seems weird to add more, after Danny Fanboy and Bobby McBlogger have had their day. But when that day is over, Apple's iPhone is still the best t...
(continues)
I would rather see that award be given to something that has done something to better human life, or to save human life.
Why give publicity to something that already has publicity? If you haven't been under a rock since last year, you know what the iPhone is Apple and At&t have made sure of that.
pepsijunky said:
Well, the problem is almost everything has been invented as far as tech stuff, anything that comes out is an improvement on the last. blockquote>
Do you really believe that?
Here is another one for ya....
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."
--Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, ** 1899 **