Cingular or Verizon!?!?
now if you had said more people to use your mobile to mobile minutes, you'd be correct, but verizon's mobile to mobile map matches the america's choice map. and everyone knows who has the best nationwide coverage....
Only Cingular has true nationwide mobile to mobile, meaning that you can use mobile to mobile minutes across the ENTIRE NETWORK. You can't do this with any other company, including Verizon. And on top of that, Cingular has the largest digital coverage area, the only portion of a network where mobile to mobile minutes can be utilized.
http://www.verizonwireless.com/images_b2c/maps/natio ... »
cingular's m2m coverage (orange)
http://onlinestore.cingular.com/html/Maps/nation_GSM ... »
verizon's is larger.
Look at it this way. Cingular's network is all-digital and has 290 million POPs (potential customers due to coverage), the most of any service provider. Verizon's network is a combination of digital and analog coverage (from roaming partners) and has 242 million POPs. So Cingular obviously has the larger coverage, and once again, it is all digital. Therefore, since Cingular offers true nationwide mobile to mobile, their network is the largest network to utilize mo...
(continues)
population doesn't equal larger coverage area. the amount of places you can physically use your phone equals coverage area. verizon can't offer their own service in areas where they use roaming partners, but that doesn't mean you can't use the phone in those areas, nor does it mean you can't use your m2m minutes in those areas.
verizon has analog areas, but they are in areas where cingular does not have coverage perio...
(continues)
If you want to argure that POPs aren't directly related to coverage area, then go right ahead. It just seems a little far-fetched to argue that a difference of 48 million POPs is not going to prove a point that the coverage area MUST be larger, especially considering Cingular only services 3 more top 100 markets than Verizon does. That surely wouldn't make up 48 million POPs alone. But look at it as you will...
fact is, in those pink areas you see on verizon's map, they can't be counted as potential customers because verizon does not have phone numbers to offer in those areas. if you live in the extended network, you can't get a verizon phone, unless you give verizon an address that's in the vzw network.
that said, you CAN use your phone in those areas, use your m2m minutes, and not pay roaming charges. you're just using Alltell's network, or some local carrier.
cingular can offer it's service to more customers. that doesn't mean your cingular phone will work in more places.
again, you've seen the maps. it's clear you can use your verizon phone in more digital areas than you can with...
(continues)
if you can use your phone in more digital/mobile to mobile areas with your cingular phone than you can with your verizon phone, where are the maps wrong?
About 80% of the people reading this will probably laugh at that idea. First of all, the national maps are so broad and general that they are never that accurate. Plus, nearly everybody in the wireless industry knows that ALL carriers exaggerate coverage on national maps.
I'm not purposely dodging the question. It just is utterly ridiculous to judge/compare a company's coverage by its coverage map, unless you were comparing all local coverage maps.
I don't know where those maps are wrong, of if they are wrong at all. But to me, just by looking at those maps the mobile to mobile coverage is too close to call.
To me, the numbers say it all.
think of it this way:
you put up a tower over an apartment building that housed 300 people, but you could only use your phone in the apartment.
i put up a tower in a 10 square block area where only 100 people live.
you have more potential customers. i have a larger coverage area.
I guess the numbers and the maps just won't convice either one of us.
Speedywalk
"It ain't broke, it just needs duct tape!"
speedywalk said:
Speedywalk
"It ain't broke, it just needs duct tape!"
OMG! you made my night... -...LMFAO as I submit this thread...-
Even though GSM phones are not equipped with analog roaming, they are equipped with GPS. If my phone didn't have a signal it can still make "emergency calls", which aren't really calls at all but send out an emergency signal. But hey if it still gets me assistance, what's the difference than actually trying to tell the person on the other end of the analog signal (good luck with that) that you're in need of assistance.
I was making the point that if Verizon's analog is the only thing that is going to make a person's decision, its not a very good reason. If I'm stranded in the middle of nowhere, I'm going to be able to get assistance with Verizon's analog (if I can get the call through) or Cingular's GPS.
I never stated anything about Verizon's service being analog where Cingular has none. That would be ridiculous because their digital footprints would have to be identical, and we all know that's not true considering Cingular has the largest digital network.
VZW has a larger coverage area when analog is added to the pic thus with the america's choice a larger m2m footprint... But you can only have a tri-mode phone and no other...
Cingular has a larger m2m customer base and a larger digital footprint, also a customer can use ANY of our phones, they don't need to be tri or quad band phones...
Also, whoever argues that POP's are not important to coverage may not fully understand the importance of POP's... I'm not going to educate since the only reason that's talked down is bcz Cingular has more, only reason it's talked up is bcz Cingular has more... Should the roles b...
(continues)
RUFF1415 said:
The analog argument is useless.
Even though GSM phones are not equipped with analog roaming, they are equipped with GPS. If my phone didn't have a signal it can still make "emergency calls", which aren't really calls at all but send out an emergency signal. But hey if it still gets me assistance, what's the difference than actually trying to tell the person on the other end of the analog signal (good luck with that) that you're in need of assistance.
You can have the signal no one is going to respond to. I'll take the live person. After all your good responses, this one doesn't make much sense. Analog works great and I have used it, especially when the network used to be ALL anal...
(continues)
canddmeyer said:...RUFF1415 said:
The analog argument is useless.
Even though GSM phones are not equipped with analog roaming, they are equipped with GPS. If my phone didn't have a signal it can still make "emergency calls", which aren't really calls at all but send out an emergency signal. But hey if it still gets me assistance, what's the difference than actually trying to tell the person on the other end of the analog signal (good luck with that) that you're in need of assistance.
You can have the signal no one is going to respond to. I'll take the live person. After all your good responses, this one doesn't make much sense. Analog works great and I have used it, especially
(continues)
"Hey Joe...There's an emergency signal coming from Devil's Rock! Isn't that where some people rock climb during this time of year?"
"Yeah, yeah I think you're right."
"Well should we do something about it?"
"Nah, who'd be rock climbing on a day like this?"
Riiiigggghhhhht. 🤣
It is a fact that Cingular has a larger nationwide coverage area and a larger digital coverage area. Now Verizon does in fact have a larger network altogether, but if a customer has a digital only phone and they go to one of those analog coverage areas, well sorry folks there is no coverage (and don't try to argue about Tri Mode phones because more than half of verizons selection is dual band CDMA Digital only).
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/coveragemap ... »
My argument was that Cingular has more coverage and more POPs than Verizon. Could you please restate the question?
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/coveragemap ... »
http://www.verizonwireless.com/images_b2c/maps/natio ... »
and i quote: pink/red: America's Choice AND NATIONAL IN CALLING Home Airtime Rate and Coverage Area....
who's spreading misinformation again?
"New Cingular to serve 46 Million Customers With Largest Digital Voice and Data Wireless Network in U.S."
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?A ... »
And they're network has grown considerably even since then. They've added 1,000 new cell sites across the nation and acquired a small network in Michigan.
Ericveli said:
If Cingular is better then why was there churn almost twice as much as VZW in the 4th quarter?
Churn can constist of alot, including agents or reps having someone sign up on new numbers and cancel their old numbers, just so that they get paid... Not just people leaving the company to go to the big VzW 😲
I say try them both. Take advantage of the trial periods and see what you think. Besides, this thread has turned into a pissing match anyway. Just try them both and make up your own mind.
(continues)
Cingular's UMTS/HSDPA network has speed capabilities of 14.4 mbps. Verizon's EV-DO network has speed capabilities of 3.2 mbps. Wait, tell me whose is faster now? And Cingular has PTT planned for release in the upcoming months also. And once again, I'm betting they'll complete the rollout faster than Verizon will.
Cin...
(continues)
HSPDA is no wherenear ready to roll out and EV DO Rev O is faster than UMTS in case you didn't know.
When Cingular aquired ATT they paid 41 Billion but also aquired 5 billion of their debt with the deal.
The first HSPDA call from a handset was place within the last week or so by qualcom and nortel so I find it odd that HSPDA is up and running in 7 cities.
You might want to retract the statement above because Verizon currently has the fastest Data network in the country.
Can you hear me now??? This message brought to you by the power of EV DO Rev A!! 🤣
UMTS is absolutely ready to roll out and HSDPA is only a software upgrade away. Cingular isn't going to make promises that they can't keep, they've kept their promises time and time again. They said they would have their GSM overlay completed within a year and they did it in 8 months. They said they'll have their UMTS overlay nearly complete by the end of the year, and believe me they'll do it.
Too bad that Verizon isn't us...
(continues)
According to Verizon and AT&T, EV-DO averages 300-500 kbps, while WCDMA averages 220-320 kbps. But according to most people, (and my own personal experience,) Verizon's estimates are conservative. They do that for legal reasons - they could get in trouble for false advertising if they overpromise. So in reality, Verizon's EV-DO service is more than twice as fast as AT&T's WCDMA, (and using far less spectrum).
HSDPA is fantastic in theory, but it's not available yet. When I met with Cingular spokespeople last week, they said they don't expect to launch HSDPA until 2006. Until then, EV-DO Rev...
(continues)
The fact that WCDMA uses more spectrum than EV-DO is irrelevant. WCDMA is a single technology for voice AND data. EV-DO is specifically data and seperate spectrum must be used to implement it ontop of CDMA voice.
I know that WCDMA is the same thing as UMTS. However, I prefer UMTS because people get confused and think that WCDMA is the same as CDMA, when its not.
EDGE is faster than CDMA 2000 1X. Hence Cingular's title to "Fastest Nationwide Data Network".
I have no worries that HSDPA will live up to its hype. Don't you worry too much either.
There's no Cingular employee here.
And I'm not even going to try and put a lame closer in my post......
(continues)
This message brought to you by HSDPA and thats the correct spelling!
Once again, don't worr about Cingular staying number one. They apparently are doing fine.
Adding 1.8 million customers in one quarter, all while going through a merger is a pretty amazing feat. They lowered their churn considerably too. Can't wait to see what happens in these upcoming quarters. Higher net adds and lower churn. Looking good... 🙂
I'm honestly not trying to be rude but you would have to be mentally challenged to think Cingular could have made a profit last quarter. They just spent $41 billion on another company, and I know you know that. What company has $41 billion in revenue for one quarter?
Hmmm, sounds like Cingular kicked Verizon's ass considering they were/are in the midst of a merger and STILL added more customers than Verizon did.
Keep it up Cingular. 🙂
My argument is about how well a person is going to be able to utilize that extra chunk of network. If you're being realistic Cingular's network is going to benefit most customers better because they can choose whatever phone they please and they don't have to worry about paying roaming charges on the minutes that are "free".
(continues)
What do the people I will be talking to use. M2M is the way to go!
What kind of phone do I want? Cingular I must say has way cooler phones than Verizon.
What other areas do I travel and what works better?
Am I wireless tech savvy? I say this because Verizon's customer care (not only in my opinion but in consumer reports and jd power) is better than cingulars. I know wireless in and out so customer service is really at the bottom of my list. I can take care of 90% of problems on my own.
For pretty much purely the m2m factor I stick with Verizon, though cingular would suit me equally well.
The decision is yours.