funny that no one posted at&t 2Q numbers...
Wireless Operational Highlights
AT&T delivered strong wireless growth in the second quarter with solid subscriber gains, continued rapid growth in wireless data revenues and improved margins. Highlights include the following:
* 15.8 Percent Wireless Revenue Growth. Total wireless revenues increased 15.8 percent to $12.0 billion in the second quarter, and wireless service revenues, which exclude handset and accessory sales, grew 14.8 percent to $11.0 billion. Wireless revenue growth was driven by solid subscriber gains and a greater number of customers choosing more advanced smartphones and integrated devices, spurring increased usage of data services. Retail ...
(continues)
Its-The-Network said:
att did ok...Verizon still added more plus Verizon has the lower churn and more post paid customers. But hey you got the iphone 🤣
and a network that works in my office, unlike Verizon. Most reliable my ass.
nationwide its not even close.
MidnightDT said:
100% most reliable. just not in your office.
nationwide its not even close.
Ah, the power of marketing.
Keep drinking the kool-aid my friend 🙂
MidnightDT said:
100% most reliable. just not in your office.
nationwide its not even close.
Dumb argument. Coverage is ONLY important where one lives works and plays most of the time. The rest is a waste for them and means nothing.
Why would anyone but a VErizon employee care about having coverage where someone does not go and never will go...
Thats like saying GSM coverage is worldwide therefore its better...
AvgJoe said:MidnightDT said:
100% most reliable. just not in your office.
nationwide its not even close.
Dumb argument. Coverage is ONLY important where one lives works and plays most of the time. The rest is a waste for them and means nothing.
Why would anyone but a VErizon employee care about having coverage where someone does not go and never will go...
Thats like saying GSM coverage is worldwide therefore its better...
Can you even begin to fathom how short-sighted and dim-witted your argument is??? For somebody who has such a holistic viewpoint on life (which you do, I'm old enough and mature enough to see your gems sprinkled in all of your rhetoric), to s...
(continues)
Don't go too far in your attempts and intelligent response it's clearly unfamiliar territory and I can see it doesn't take much to "break your brain" (whatever that means).
Looks to me your one brain cell is fighting for dominance.
Coverage only matters where you live work and play period. Thats why regionals have customers. Hell Alltel has more customers than Verizon in most of the markets they serve together. Go figure, Sparky.
Heres another thought....Nevermind ........ I'm not sure you have a place to put it!
Hell Alltel has more subscribers than Verizon in many markets they serve together. And they are regional company. Largest sometimes in not the best.
AshDizzle said:
More cell sites give you more service where you live, work, and play.
not really. where i live four different companies and 5 different networks work where i live and at&t isn't one of them!
/angry i had to switch.
AshDizzle said:
Explain your post because I don't understand it.
crackberry said:AshDizzle said:
More cell sites give you more service where you live, work, and play.
not really. where i live four different companies and 5 different networks work where i live and at&t isn't one of them!
/angry i had to switch.
it was sarcasm. verizon, sprint (both cdma and iden), alltel and cellular south work where i live. at&t does not... there was never good service but i could get one bar maybe two in one little area of the house, but i've lost that and even mti and att.com coverage map changed to show no service where i live... so working for at...
(continues)
Let everyone know that you are one person who is exempt from my statement before.
Allow me to revise it:
More cell sites give you more service where you live, work, and play. Except at Crackberry's house. Where AT&T doesn't work.