AT&T Makes Deal to Buy BellSouth for $67B
The deal would substantially expand the reach of AT&T, already the country's largest telecommunications company by the number of customers served.
AT&T will pay 1.325 of its own shares for each BellSouth share. Based of Friday's closing price of $27.99 for AT&T shares, that works out to be $37.09 for each BellSouth share, an 18 percent premium from the Friday closing price of $31.46 for the Atlanta-based company.
AT&T was formed by San Antonio-based SBC's acquisition of AT&T Corp. in November. The deal added a substantial national reach to the for...
(continues)
I think this has both its positives and negatives. I'm glad to see the AT&T name ressurected entirely though. I honestly think the brand recognition with AT&T is unparalleled. There are still people I know of that say "Cingular who?" Not the case with AT&T.
-llkoola1
-- George Santayana
The issue that resulted in AT&T's original breakup is not an issue today.
It's not even the same type of situation. You're kidding yourself.
The telecommunications landscape is completely different. Competition exists from wireless, satellite, fiber and cable, when none existed when ATT was originally broken up.
He either doesn't want to see it or isn't intelligent enough to understand the difference.
In how many markets in which att and/or Bellsouth operate is their multiple options (minimum of 3) for local dialtone, long distance, broadband and video services?
If you are so old and wise how can you even compare the 70's and 80's to telecommunication choices in this day and age?
Please answer those 3 questions for us o' grand wizard.
Second prediction, now that my first has come to fruition:
It won't be AT&T Wireless, or Mobile, or Without Cables & Wires, or whatever. I think the goal if it meets approval is - AT&T. One website, office, etc. You go to their website or call them on the phone it will be the same as calling Banko America or Banco Popular... Choose 1 for checking, 2 for credit card, 3 for English...1 for Local, 2 for Long Distance, etc...
Verizon is not interested in spinning off it's wireless business, and I am willing to wager it is due to the issue ATTWS had when it spun out of ATT. Never did come to fruition as the money maker they hoped it would become. I doubt current att will do it either.
It took a while, but even Lubbock now has local service via cable, plus a reseller, plus SBC.
While my knowledge is limited on the backbone issue I initially fall on the side of att. My reason for that is due to the fact that I have followed the fight between Verizon/att/Bellsouth versus the resellers who basically wanted cheap access to networks in which they invested nothing. This is a similar argument. Regardless of how they got the opportunity to build the network, it still cost money to build. Recovering costs today (and even making profits on an already paid for network) builds the networks of tomorrow.
I'm talking about sales AND installation.
While my knowledge is limited on the backbone issue I initially fall on the side of att.
...the fight between Verizon/att/Bellsouth versus the resellers who basically wanted cheap access to networks in which they invested nothing.
...Regardless of how they got the opportunity to build the network, it still cost money to build. Recovering costs today (and even making profits on an already paid for network) builds the networks of tomorrow.
Verizon, AT&T, SBC, & Google – Let’s End the “Free Lunch” For Everyone!
Verizon and SBC/Southwest Bell/Pac Bell/Pacific Telesis/AT&T or whatever they’re called this year has called for an end to “free lunches” on the internet – running out of ...
(continues)
These telecoms who helped to develop the internet with monies provided by the public are desperately trying to privatize it with the hope of increasing revenues for their companies and in the process force consumers into limited options and into paying for the same services three times; once for developing the network, once for using the network, and once for the bandwidth of the network.
These telecoms are also trying to prevent municipalities from developing communication mediums such as wi-fi. At&T has donated large amounts...
(continues)
McInerney and other analysts figure the local phone companies all together have $350 billion to $400 billion worth of obsolete assets on their books. They can't write them off wit ...
(continues)
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
-- George Santayana
I never knew that it only took a decade or two to forget about all the money local, state, and federal governments give to you in the form of tax breaks/deductions, incentives, and other perks.
Bury you head in the sand if you like, I shall not.