Home  ›  Carriers  ›

AT&T

Info & Phones News Forum  

all discussions

show all 5 replies

Cingular and the auctions...

the_eraser

Aug 16, 2006, 6:43 PM
Does anyone know why is it that Cingular didn't bid as much as other carriers? I got this from RCR and I was surprised to see how little interest Cingular showed. Is it that we don't need as much spectrum as the other carriers? Can someone explain?

"Top 10 Highest Bidders by the end of Round 18
Bidders Net total of high bids
1. Verizon Wireless $2.8 billion
2. T-Mobile $2.6 billion
3. SpectrumCo $1.2 billion
4. MetroPCS $1 billion
5. Cingular $587 million
6. Denali Spectrum $426 million
7. Cricket $163 million
8. AWS Wireless $98 million
9. Barat Wireless $79 million
10. Atlantic Wireless $24 million"
...
ralph_on_me

Aug 16, 2006, 6:54 PM
They probably didn't need a lot of it.
...
ygbhen

Aug 16, 2006, 7:04 PM
No they shouldn't. ATTWS had a large footprint just about everywhere. Seems like they are only concerned with getting more in the west.
...
sowhatsowhat10

Aug 16, 2006, 7:11 PM
they dont need much at all (atleast for themselves).

awhile back i even believe i saw something that says they had too much and had to give some up when purchasing at&tws.

if im correct they only needed some out on the west. cingular has affiliates as most carriers do. so those smaller affiliates will bid (and win) and lease their spectrum to cingular or whatever carrier.

now if cingular pisses any of these affiliates off and they seperate then cingular has to either purchase that spectrum from them, rent from another, be @$$ed out, or wait until more spectrum becomes available to bid on or purchase.


dont quote me but i believe that's how it was explained to me.

hope this helps.
...
nextel18

Aug 16, 2006, 8:01 PM
Well Cingular is just going after some markets where they see that they can add some value too. It would be better to add in many areas, but there are bigger players out there who need spectrum and who want to grow better. In addition, ATTWS had a lot of spectrum so that helps with their decision-making in any auction. The problem is, you can never have enough spectrum unless the FCC tells you that you cannot.

You also have to take note that perhaps they bid on some spectrum but were outbid by others and decided not to take any action to win the spectrum back.
...
colione112

Aug 16, 2006, 9:15 PM
It isn't needed. With att, they acquired a ton of spectrum, it's just a matter of building on it.
...

You must log in to reply.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on BlueSky Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Follow @phonescoop on Threads Phone Scoop on Facebook

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2025 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.