Three 'supercarriers' and T-Mobile... what's T-M's plan?
And then there's T-Mobile, trying to compete with the above, with 16 million customers and a much smaller revenue stream.
I'm just wondering what T-M's strategy is going to be to compete with the above. The coverage that the three 'supercarriers' will be eventually able to bring to bear (and that Verizon already brings to bear) once the mergers are technologically complete is pretty frightening. What will T-Mobo do? Will they try to simply be the cheap urban-only alternative, or will they do a go-for-broke coverage expansion via mergers with any regional GSM carrier they can snap up plus big...
(continues)
BetterThanJake said:...
Verizon, 42 million customers, check. Cingular & ATTW merger, 46 million customers, check. Sprint and Nextel merger, 39 million customers, check.
And then there's T-Mobile, trying to compete with the above, with 16 million customers and a much smaller revenue stream.
I'm just wondering what T-M's strategy is going to be to compete with the above. The coverage that the three 'supercarriers' will be eventually able to bring to bear (and that Verizon already brings to bear) once the mergers are technologically complete is pretty frightening. What will T-Mobo do? Will they try to simply be the cheap urban-only alternative, or will they do a go-for-broke coverage expansion via mergers with any regio
(continues)
Speedywalk
"It ain't broke, it just needs duct tape!"
Speedywalk
"It ain't broke, it just needs duct tape!"
speedywalk said:
ummm.....ok. All I can say is obviously you haven't used a 3G CDMA phone recently. They're not that bad at all...close enough to GSM to be a viable alternative, with the added benefit of not having a SIM card to lock the phone up. They're both parallel technologies, very comparable to each other. But CDMA appears to be ahead in the future for data services...so take it as you will.
Speedywalk
"It ain't broke, it just needs duct tape!"
all i can say is that the 3g phone is not a CDMA phone, it is a W-CDMA phone.....completely different technology, CDMA is FAR FAR FAR behind the times, W-CDMA is the wave of the future
WCDMA (UMTS)
Wideband Code-Division Multiple-Access (W-CDMA) is one of the main technologies for the implementation of third-generation (3G) cellular systems. It is base on radio access technique proposed by ETSI Alpha group and the specifications was finalised 1999.
The implementation of W-CDMA will be a technical challenge because of it's complexity and versatility. The complexity of W-CDMA systems can be viewed from different angles: the complexity of each single algorithm, the complexity of the overall system and the computational complexity of a receiver. W-CDMA link-level simulations are over 10 times more compute-intensive than current second-generation simulations. In W-CDMA int...
(continues)
bizkitsngravy said:...
W-CDMA is not so much network, but rather data
WCDMA (UMTS)
Wideband Code-Division Multiple-Access (W-CDMA) is one of the main technologies for the implementation of third-generation (3G) cellular systems. It is base on radio access technique proposed by ETSI Alpha group and the specifications was finalised 1999.
The implementation of W-CDMA will be a technical challenge because of it's complexity and versatility. The complexity of W-CDMA systems can be viewed from different angles: the complexity of each single algorithm, the complexity of the overall system and the computational complexity of a receiver. W-CDMA link-level simulations are over 10 times more compute-intensive than current seco
(continues)
DCS-String: I wasnt quite sure what you were talking about, so I did some reserch, and after finding similar answers on several different sites I came up with "DCS-String" is a computer language which allows you to control remote terminals (I think??) It doesn't have anything to do with wireless phones.
Here is just the last site that I visited:
http:// »...
(continues)
That seems to be a play on what a friend of mine calls SBC service, i.e. 'String Between Cans' (SBC).
Works for other carriers too:
VZW- Variety of Zealots Wireless
(Sprint or Metro) PCS- Pretty Crappy Service
ATTW- All-Time Train Wreck
🙂
AT&T - Always Tedious and Troublesome Worthless Sheyat
SBC - Suckered to Buy Cingular
VZW - Vehemently Zero Worth
Cingular - Calls Incoming Not Great Unless Low quality Apparatus Rendered
How about these for size folks? 😈 😁
JessiCSR said:
Well, for starters, DCS isn't a carrier. 🤣
I know but the others are. 🤣
sunilsonia said:JessiCSR said:
Well, for starters, DCS isn't a carrier. 🤣
I know but the others are. 🤣
GSM (particularly when coverage is not available)......Got Service? Man
JessiCSR said:
Keep in mind, your precious T-mobile is GSM 😉
Hence, the joke!
And there's Tmobile not paying 41 billion dollars for a cellular company that it basically has to put back together/merge/upgrade. It'll take at least another two years for Cingular to reap any benefits (and truly finish what it's set out to do). Tmobile, on the other hand, is lean, has an amazing corporate parent, and is adding customers at an excellent rate. I don't see Tmobile as being handicapped by the fact it has *only* 16 or so million customers.
And then there's T-Mobile, trying to compete with the above, with 16 million customers and a much smaller revenue stream.
Aleq said:
Especially since two years ago we were expecting to be at 8 million but got 10 instead. How many of the "supercarriers" have doubled their customer base in the past two years, WITHOUT buying it outright?
Preach it. T-Mobile isn't the "lil engine that could". We are the "lil engine that can and have done so".
How you like them apples?
🤣
(continues)
If I read the letter correctly, that was T-Mobile USA's financial contribution to T-Mo international over 2004. DT is very pleased.Another reason that Deutsche is very much behind its US arm. Tmobile isn't going anywhere.
terryjohnson16 said:
😁 She said that the President said that 2005 is going to be a Strong year for T-Mobile. I hope better phones, and especially with EDGE, I hope its faster than Cingulars, and allow the Voice Coverage to increase by 50% so we can bump Cingular, Sprint and Nextel out of the Market.
As much as I support T-Mobile, that would be horrible! First off, I think they will always be contenders, but there's no telling where this industry is going to evolve to. As far as "bumping" everyone out of the market, that would be catastrophic economically. You don't ever want to have one major super power for more reasons than one. Balance is a good thing 🙂
We don't need any more contributions towards...
(continues)
terryjohnson16 said:
😁 She said that the President said that 2005 is going to be a Strong year for T-Mobile. I hope better phones, and especially with EDGE, I hope its faster than Cingulars, and allow the Voice Coverage to increase by 50% so we can bump Cingular, Sprint and Nextel out of the Market.
Uh, it's good to hope.
most of shoutcast stations runs 128k streaming mp3 format
but with EDGE and shoutcast, I can simply forget XM radio
and I don't even have to jump to Cingular for EDGE, because I checked the updated Data Connect brochure, that NY state don't have EDGE coverage yet 🙄