T-Mobile possible outcomes based on actual FACTS.
(continues)
http://www.bellsouth.com/investor/pdf/1q05p_slides.pdf »
http://www.t-mobile.com/company/investors/financial_ ... »
2. Just because someone didn't go to an ivy league school does not mean that they don't have the capacity to make forward thinking business decisions.
3. I hope some Harvard professor rips you a new one, belittles you in front of all your peers and puts you in your place you pompous jackass!!!
Here is an article about 3G:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8379761/ »
Sprint is GOING to launch 3G, and Cingular has 3G in 6 markets (big deal) and will have it in 16 markets by the end of this year if all goes well. That is far behind Verizon who has 3G technology in more than 50 markets. Cingualar and Sprint are not in a very good position regarding 3G deployment either.
(continues)
First I'd like to say thanks for the very interesting post. It's sad to see that your information evoked such a negative emotional response from so many people. I don't completely agree with all of your points, but I see a certain degree of validity in them nonetheless.
I think you are right about the fact that T-Mobile has fallen behind on the 3G race. The interesting thing is that (in my experience) most customers don't seem to even notice. I sell both Cingular and T-Mobile, and even though the data speeds are better, most customers who are interested primarily in data will steer away from the higher priced Cingular plans and opt for the more competitively priced T-Mobile ones.
After all - who wants to pay $45-80/m...
(continues)
Good point. About AWE sinking boat/TMO sinking- the thing is TMO must buy spectrum, and actually launch 3G from ground up. AWS already had a 3G plan, so AWE had more than monetary value. TMO is simply needing a network upgrade, to oeven consider 3G. However, if Arun Sarin (VODA CEO) did choose to leave VZ, in exchange for TMO he would have to leave VZ- most profitable wireless carrier in USA. in Exchange for 103 million a year. AWS at the time was 3rd in subs, and 2nd in profit, so AWS was attractive to buyers like Cingular, and Voda. By the way, I am amazed at how fast Cingular was able to take AWS from nunber one in CC, to dead last. TMO is now number 2 in CC. TMO could do much better, but by cutting its prices so much, it has remo...
(continues)
I think you are right about broadband wireless. Eventually, it will become more and more 'necessary' for common applications on cell phones and mobile devices. It's not right now, so no one really notices, and T-Mobile can continue with the good growth that it has exhibited in the past.
I think that was the whole point though of the people who were speculating that Deutsche Telekom would try to sell T-Mobile rather than upgrading their network - that DT realizes that broadband wireless internet will be perceived as 'necessary' in the eyes of the consumer, and at that point if they have not made the needed expensive upgrades to their network that they will be in trouble. Not wanting to invest a large amo...
(continues)
Hi Adam.
no reason for voda to buy out tmobile, that is a struggling company with nothing going for them instead of keeping a company like verizon wireless. who cares about gsm? who cares? its about profits in the wireless industry and verizon wireless is that. nextel/sprint is also but if they, voda, had to either keep their stake in verizon wireless or buy tmobile and sell their stake in vzw. my decision would be that they would keep it.
like u said.. if they wanted a gsm company they would have already bought tmobile or att wireless a long time ago. (or earlier)
This is a post from an editor of this website, Eric Lin.
https://www.phonescoop.com/news/discuss.php?fm=m&ff= ... »
Clearly Vodafone is ready and willing to ditch Verizon for total ownership of a GSM company.
After looking over the links to the PDF's you provided I can say while I agree with your assesment of some of the comments posted about this issue, I think you need some extra assignment on your financial analysis. To use your preferred metric of net income, T-Mo comes out quite well by "only making" $103 million in the quarter as compared to the $240 million Net Loss of Cingular for the quarter. You would have done much better by comparing it to Verizon who had Net Income of $1.2 billion.
Another point in which you are truly off the mark is the "$35 billion in unaudited debt". That is the total of all liabilities and equity in the company. The real debt figure is somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 bill...
(continues)
Please don't think I was trying to point out that Cingular was doing badly, I wasn't. I think that Cingular is actually doing quite well considering all of the projects (specifically, consolidation and IT infrastructure related) that they are curently working on and the financial resources required to undertake those projects. The point of my post was to point out just a few of the flaws and inaccuracies of Insiders "analysis" of the T-Mo financial situation as well his his assesment that T-Mo is a sinking ship. 🙂
1) Much of your conversation is focused on Net Income, not an especially relevant metric, especially for a fast growing company in a capital intensive industry.
2) Last I checked it was the WSJ (not TMo CC reps) who started the rumor that Vodafone was a prime candidate in any potential takeover. Perhaps you should be writing them a letter to express your views on the issue?
Now for some things that don't appear to be "FACTS."
1) As someone else mentioned, the $35B debt figure seems to have been pulled from thin air. The actual published figure for Y04 is $11B in long term liabilities.
2) How exact...
(continues)
outsideAG said:
I think there's a show on MTV about this. Ashton Kutcher is in it, but for some reason I can't seem to remember what it's called. 🤣
Your rebuttal was quite good, well-written and logically, pretty tight. However, the above statement was the only part of the post that really made me laugh.