Is alltel going to shut off my phone?
Alltel is following the rules laid out by the federal government (FCC). If Alltel, does not comply with rules then they will receive fines until 100% compliant. More stuff could happen to Alltel if they don’t comply but that’s different subject.
This is good for the whole community (people and the EMA).
You can thank all the people who can't seem to figure out where they are but somehow can dial their phones. It is the government here to "help" protect you from yourself and thus is mandating E911 for location services.
Your non-integrated location service doesn't comply with the E911 requirements.
I'm sure your thinking would be different if the only thing you could is dial 911.
The old system could only triangulate your position (under standard circumstances). That means they have a 6 to10 mile radius from your position.
Here is an example: My friend hit some deer on a rural road and ended up rolling over into a ditch. Just before he passed out from a head injury he dialed 911. In his case, he was 2 miles away from the only tower connecting a corridor on a rural highway. EMS and the sheriff were able to use technology to locate him within the radius of that tower. It was a good thing because the accident caused his spleen to rupture. EMS stated that if they could have found him sooner then his ...
(continues)
Phase II service generally provides upgraded emergency call centers with your location when you make a call. This phase is a joint venture between the public safety entity and the wireless carrier. Both play a role in providing the service, and it is up to the public safety entity in the area to initiate the request. On Alltel's network, callers must have a GPS-capable phone in order for 9-1-1...
(continues)
I don't think you understood the example I was using. The example was stating that triangulation to locate a cellular call to 911 was an insufficient method. It was promoting Enhanced 911 for its use of GPS technology.
The example used was from 6 years ago in reply to "cattlebaron's" sarcastic post.
My god, E911 is a completely better solution. Heck, the example was stating that if E911 with GPS was being used, then EMS personnel would have been able to locate him faster. Instead of being in critical condition upon arrival, he could probably been in just serious condition.
In most instances the FCC has been slow and cautious about forcing consumers to upgrade their products (ex. HDTV signals and HDTV) and even then they made it a requirement that HDTV converters for older TVs were available.
The reasons that that the FCC gave for forcing E911 on us were 1) cell phone services are a luxury and thus voluntary 2) it was too costly to put on a few subscribers and 3) the bene...
(continues)
“Cattlebaron”, I understand the cost of infrastructure for the implementing E911 system. I'm of the opinion that giving a consumer the choice to have this service as an “add-on” would be a mistake.
Yes, cell phones are luxury not a necessity. Example: You don’t need to buy a new vehicle every 4 to 6 years.
I respect your opinion. As for my opinion, I believe this will be a great step in saving lives in the times of emergency.