Motorola V710

Simple, return it and get the CDM-9900, you'll have less headaches and sleep better..

he didnt say anything bad about the phone itself. but he doesnt like what verizon did to the phone. i agree completely with him. shame on you verizon. SHAME ON YOU!

Just look at all you pathetic people, STOP WINING! Go to the CDM-9900 forum, you'll see no bickering there. Just really satisfied people that LOVE the phone and aren't angered by it.

PHANTOM_LORD said:
Just look at all you pathetic people, STOP WINING! Go to the CDM-9900 forum, you'll see no bickering there. Just really satisfied people that LOVE the phone and aren't angered by it.

What? Who whined and complained? I love my v710.

Not you the other's who are irritating me 🤣

YES, I LOVE MY V710 AS WELL. AND SO DOES EVERYONE THAT I SHOW IT OFF TO. but its potential wont be fully realized until verizon unlocks its already built in features.

I'd rather have the V710 and all of its shortcomings over an Audiovox phone.

HAHA Audiovox is made in Japan and it's total QUALITY. Yea, I rather own a Kia car and accept it with all it's shortcomings than own a toyota or Honda. 🤣

I could care less where it's made. The phone simply doesn't compare and that is why Verizon is basically giving the phone away as long as you sign a contract. Despite all of the issues with Bluetooth being limited, side by side the Audiovox doesn't stand up to the V710.

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

Just look at all the reviews compared to the 710. Well, if you don't see the light then I totally pity you. Verizon is practically giving away a fantastic phone that blows the doors off the 710. And suckers like you are paying top dollar for headaches and problems. So that doesn't really say much for the 710 owners. Your probably out of your 15 day worry free guarantee and now your stuck with the v710 and now you have the worry of owning an inferior phone. So I totally understand your frustrations

If you read the threads in this forum carefully, you will find that most of the complaints about the V710 involve features that the Audiovox does not even offer.

I have fooled around with the Audiovox and would take the V710 over that phone in an instant. In addition to having more features, including BT, the design of the V710 is sleeker and the screen crisper.

You may have a great cellphone. However, I had a great cellphone way back when I used the StarTac. I think people purchasing the V710 are looking for more cutting edge technology from the phone.

Exactly, that is why the engineers at Audiovox were smart enough and decided to leave those features out because they can see how much trouble Moto users are having. I would not spend $100 for a transflash card to put a few mp3's on a card and the blue-tooth is practically useless! Just look how funny those people look with that silly looking BT earpiece sticking out of their ear. That is embarrassing. I agree, the star tac and also the V8160 had been wonderful phones but that was the past. Yes, I actually used to be a Moto fan myself but when I got my hands on the T720, I was very unhappy with that and Verizon took that back from me 8 months later and gave me the LG-VX6000 and was happy with that phone. No, the Audiovox screen is much more...
(continues)

Westsidenyc the V710 does not sport a QVGA screen as does the Cdm-990. So how can you possibly say the V710 has a crisper screen?Look at them side by side. I have and saw the difference myself. That is why the 9900 is made in Japan and not the V710. No one can get the quality that the Japanese produce. It's a fact. They are more advanced then anyone and have all the latest in electronics before anyone else.

Well that forum must be terribly boring if you are spending so much time junking up the V710 forum with your time wasting PR for the 9900.

Actually, I am doing you all a favor and trying to get you to see the light that the Audiovox blows away the V710. Junking up? I believe my friend, that it's been junked up very long before I even posted here. After reading all the complaints and frustrations you people have with the 710, I am so glad I never made that plunge into headache city. 🤣

I can understand your frustration and getting a bit on the defensive Proto. After all, you purchased an inferior phone with more bugs in it than my backyard has at summertime. 🤣

Feel free to go to the 9900 forum and junk that up. Or better yet, don't bother because it will make you only feel worse when you see the rave reviews on the 9900.

Dude what are you like 12 years old?

Upset mommy and daddy could only get you the cheapo $70 phone?

Go away!

I have no issues with my V710. I wanted it for the bluetooth ... the 9900 does not have that.

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Did I strike a bad chord? 🤣 🤣

Funny, I was thinking that about you also!

I am old enough and smart enough to realize a quality phone and I made the much much better choice than you did. Yes I agree your right! the 9900 does not have a useless headache such as crippled bluetooth! Now, go away and play with your crippled bluetoothless phone LOL

Great. I am happy you love your phone.

The bluetooth obviously isn't crippled as it works great with my Jabra Headset, and I am able to use DUN from my laptop and/or IPAQ to connect to the internet for mail when WiFi isn't availble.

I already had a moto USB cable ... so I can sync my contacts with Outlook to my hearts desire.

Who's talking about syncing contacts! You cannot transfer your pic's you take with the poor quality camera that the V710 sports! And I bet you must look so high tec with that Jabra the hut bluetoothless headset sticking way out of your ear. I bet your the cause of many traffic accidents 🤣

And don't tell me that it's not crippled when in fact it is. your in denial just like president Bushie!

No dodo I mean proto It wasen't $70 it was FREE! Yes worse than cheap! But the best cheap on the market. Glad your happy with your $249 purchase. 🤣

I'm glad your happy with your phone. I like mine also, but I am angry with Verizon for disabling features that I believe shouldn't be. The article seemed to be critical of Verizon not the phone itself. You would probably feel the same way if Verizon disabled those features you like.

Well my phone is much cooler then your phone! 😛 Thats what this whole argument sounds like. I dont even have the v710 and I can tell its a great phone. The only complaint that anyone has ever had is that the bluetooth isnt fully functional which it will be in the next couple of months with software upgrades. The 9900 is a great phone also but doesnt have bluetooth so it really cant be compared with the v710. As far as call quality the v710 is slightly better but not by much. I know this because I have used both phones so I am talking from personal experience. The people who bought the v710 bought it for the bluetooth. If they werent looking for bluetooth then they would have probably waited for the 9900 or just bought the vx7000 like I did....
(continues)

your so childish! 😛 This is not my moto is cooler than your Audiovox forum either. In fact the 9900 has a much better looking screen. How can you get everyone's hopes up starting rumors saying that Moto plans to release a software upgrade when in fact Moto is not even planing on producing a desktop charger for the V710. HA! I have my right to say whatever I want. So there 😛 🤣 Right, Audiovox was smart enough not to make a crippled bluetoothless feature into their marvel of a design. Thanks to the Japanese engineers who made this wonderful phone. The sound quality is better on the 9900 so who are you fooling? So is the talk and standby times.

NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR 9900. If they did then we would all be in the 9900 forum. Everything that someone says to this forum you say "HAHA YOUR STUPID, YOUR PHONE IS STUPID, GET A 9900!!" People got the phone to use the wireless headsets, wireless modem capability. If the 9900 could do that then yes you would have an argument between the 2 phones. But since it cant, then you cant compare the 2 phones other then call quality and camera quality. Even if the camera and call quality were better in the 9900 you still cant use bluetooth headsets or use it as a wireless modem on notebooks and PDAs. So, seriously, stop acting so childish. No one cares that the 9900 is better in your opinion.

LOL! Oh I see you getting a bit frustrated eh? You think I want to walk around wearing a stupid looking headset like you? lol No the camera quality is not better on the V710. Who would want such a slow INTERNET connection using a bluetoothless phone as a modem? The 9900 can connect to a laptop using a fully functioning cable with NO PROBLEMS. Audiovox was smart. So there stop acting childish yourself 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

The problem is that all V710 ers are in the 9900 forum and getting upset cause they wish they had purchased the 9900 instead. And people like you try using the bluetoothless as a as a leg to stand on knowing very well that it is crippled. Well, pal, soon you'll be in a wheelchair cause it's just going to get more crippled 🤣

Oh lord, you're like talking to a baby that was born as a brick wall. Give it a rest man seriously. I am not frustrated at all because I have a vx7000 but am getting a v710 soon to use the bluetooth headset. I could care less, I just like coming back so everyone can see how childish and petty you are.

LOL than your even more of a fool than I thought. Who in their right mind would even consider buying a problem phone. LOL Look who is childish here. 🤣

It only causes problems when you are looking for it to do something that it cant. I want to use it for the headset and it can do that so I do not see a problem. Its all about perspective and needs.

THE PROBLEM IS IT CAN"T DO ANYTHING! 😛

NOOO, its an analogy, something in easier terms for people to understand. I mean the phone is the corvette, and verizon put a 4 cylinder in it. Get it now?

Motorola is now making a Corvette..... it's made with an engine called the V710. Much worse than having one with a 4 cylinder 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣