
Nokia 6682 / 6681
6682 vs 5600 (current SideKick owner)
My contract is going to run out at the end of November and I'm thinking about upgrading my call quality without losing my ability to browse the internet.
These two phones appear to be my least expensive options so I'm hoping that someone here has used both or even all three phones so that they can give me their opinion as to which one is best.
I played around with the 6682 and the 5600 the other day. I found that they both loaded www.niketalk.com at about the same speed (5600 was a little faster). It seemed like the 5600 changed view faster and scrolled better (the image didn't blur). The 5600 also has three view options to the 6682's two (using Opera).
That's all I've got to go on for making my decision.
I brows...
(continues)
The HTC 2125 is going to come out soon and it'll have the same feature set as the 6682 (1MP camera, EDGE, improved resolution) so I'm wondering if the memory should be a significant factor in my decision making process.
yes 6682 hands down..u cant beat a Nokia
rockinfigs said:
the 8mb is built in mem so it doesnt matter since u can expand to 1gig soon..right now im runnin 512mb card
yes 6682 hands down..u cant beat a Nokia
I mentioned the memory not because I was worried about space rather, my ability to have more than one application open at a time and the speed of the looking through the menu(s).
Is that even the way the built in memory works?
What spurred my question is someone's complaint about having to shut down applications when using more than one.
I enjoy being albe to do everything at once with my Sidekick (IM, e-mail, & web).
Since you don't like jumping through hoops, how about doing the rest of "US" a huge favor, and jump off a bridge, cliff, or a tall building????????
Muhahahahahahaha!!!!!!
vpu2....OUT!!!!