
Sanyo SCP-8400
Verizon gets the 8600, and we get..
I like Sanyo, I really do. I had an 8300 for several months and it was a great phone. Ugly, sure. Lacking key features I have since taken for granted? Yes. But a a phone it was great.
This looks to be the same sort of situation, except with some features that finally bring Sanyo phones firmly into 2005.
Why the same aesthetics, though? Christ, that keypad so damn ugly. Would it have taken that much more money to invest in a better keypad, or a better screen?
PhilR8 said:
...this.
I like Sanyo, I really do. I had an 8300 for several months and it was a great phone. Ugly, sure. Lacking key features I have since taken for granted? Yes. But a a phone it was great.
This looks to be the same sort of situation, except with some features that finally bring Sanyo phones firmly into 2005.
Why the same aesthetics, though? Christ, that keypad so damn ugly. Would it have taken that much more money to invest in a better keypad, or a better screen?
Sanyo's clearly been passed up by other manufacturers...
(continues)
Naytess said:...
Well, I think what muchdrama may be addressing is that Sanyo in the last couple years has become pretty bland. IMO the Katana is the most innovative handset since the VM4500, which was the first video phone I had ever heard of. I'm not sure if it was in fact the first but, simply the first I had found when it was released. And, still...Sanyo chose NOT to make the Katana EVDO and gave it a 16-bit screen! I was blown away! Although I don't have a Sanyo right now, I've always been a huge fan. IMO they're still the best when it comes to reception in California - which could be attributed to the external/extendable attenae that Sanyo stubbornly continues to produce. But, the reality is...people are becoming bored
(continues)
Some of you folks need to learn to spell a little. It is manufacturer not manufactor. I don't even remember what the other abomination was but there is a spell checker on here, so take advantage of it and don't blame it on English not being your primary language. I can'...
(continues)
Regardless - it will drive traffic to Verizon because it is sexy. The 8400 is not. Sanyo phones are great - I've had a few and I loved them. But sexy they ain't. It's ugly. And why should I have to settle for an ugly phone when I can get a sexy one, probably for cheaper? These are the problems with Sprint.
cplnorton said:
Sayno has won the J.D. powers and association award 3 years in a row for the best cell phone manufactor out there, period. And that was based on every cell phone manufactor out there, including your fad phones like the 8600. So I don't think anyone can possibly say that other manufactors have passed Sanyo.
I was referring to Sanyo's physical design sense...they've been relying on essentially the same design (except for the Katana) for quite a while now. So, in that sense...they've clearly been passed up. JD Powers...whatever.